Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tag 1.0 with ProtoBuf pinned to working version #39

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

tanmaykm
Copy link
Member

gRPCClient.jl requires ProtoBuf v0.11. It is incompatible with 1.x versions of ProtoBuf as it was a significant rewrite and protobuf services are not yet supported there. This PR is to pin ProtoBuf version requirement to v0.11 and tag a new release of gRPCClient.

gRPCClient.jl requires ProtoBuf v0.11. It is incompatible with 1.x versions of ProtoBuf as it was a significant rewrite and protobuf services are not yet supported there.
This PR is to pin ProtoBuf version requirement to v0.11 and tag a new release of gRPCClient.
@tanmaykm tanmaykm force-pushed the tan/misc branch 2 times, most recently from 504389a to 44c839c Compare February 22, 2024 10:08
@tanmaykm
Copy link
Member Author

Not sure why codegen is failing in CI. Things seem to work fine locally. Trying to dig into it

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 23, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.84%. Comparing base (f4ccd52) to head (79c747b).

Files Patch % Lines
src/grpc.jl 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #39      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.90%   91.84%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         321      331      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits          295      304       +9     
- Misses         26       27       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

also guard against CI environment setting the COVERAGE env variable, which can conflict with the protobuf plugin script
also add experimental flag indicator to CI job name for clarity
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants