You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
When running the code on CPU (without GPU) on arm-based architectures (e.g. NVIDIA Jetson nano, UDOO neo board), the slimmable network (Mobilenetv1) works as expected at 100% width, but when slimming to lower widths the accuracy is very low - the network always predicts the same class regardless of the input, also the softmax-based confidence decreases (e.g. for 25% is 0.48), which makes me think it might be an issue with the BN layers. However the exact same code works flawless on x86-64 architectures. Also, the code works OK if ran on GPU on an ARM device (e.g. the Jetson nano).
I've tried with Python3.6, 3.8, and pytorch 1.4.0, 1.7.0, same thing.
Do you have a hint on why this weird behavior, solely on ARM CPUs?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
When running the code on CPU (without GPU) on arm-based architectures (e.g. NVIDIA Jetson nano, UDOO neo board), the slimmable network (Mobilenetv1) works as expected at 100% width, but when slimming to lower widths the accuracy is very low - the network always predicts the same class regardless of the input, also the softmax-based confidence decreases (e.g. for 25% is 0.48), which makes me think it might be an issue with the BN layers. However the exact same code works flawless on x86-64 architectures. Also, the code works OK if ran on GPU on an ARM device (e.g. the Jetson nano).
I've tried with Python3.6, 3.8, and pytorch 1.4.0, 1.7.0, same thing.
Do you have a hint on why this weird behavior, solely on ARM CPUs?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: