Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unusual distribution for Lambda z-vertex in data with vertex fit for K+ Sigma0 pi0 #694

Open
niwgit opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@niwgit
Copy link

niwgit commented Nov 9, 2022

Hi All,

I was comparing z-vertex distributions of K+, Lambda, pi- and proton between the two kinematic fit options "all masses constrained" (pi0kpsig0__B4) and "all masses constrained + no vertex fit" (pi0kpsig0__B4_F1) for the K+ Sigma0 pi0 channel using Fall 2018 data and MC. All the distributions are found using measured 4-vectors.

The K+, pi- and proton z-vertex was found directly using the measured X4 (e.g. dKPlusWrapper->Get_X4_Measured()).

For both kinematic fit options I found the Lambda decay vertex using DOCA between pi- and proton tracks. (i.e. I used measured pi- and proton tracks and found the distance of closest approach between them and use the mid point as the Lambda decay vertex.)

For the K+ z-vertex plots I removed the cut on K+ vertex z used in my analysis (51.2-78.8 cm). The cut is included for all other plots. All the plots are for the Lambda(1520) mass region in Sigma0 pi0 and after all analysis cuts.

I see significant gaps in Lambda z-vertex distribution from data when vertex fit is used ! The pi- and proton distributions also seem to show this. The K+ vertex-z distribution looks fine in data for both kinematic fit options.

z_vertex_data

All the distributions from MC look smooth for the two kinfit options. I'm not sure what's making the unusual gaps in the distribution for data with vertex fit.

z_vertex_MC

I also checked the Lambda z-vertex distribution in data using kinfit X4 for the "vertex fit" case. I used "dDecayingLambdaWrapper->Get_X4()" to get the Lambda decay vertex. There also I see a similar effect.

z_Lambda_kinfit

Here are some information about the data and MC used.

Data - Fall 2018 analysis launches ver17 for "pi0kpsig0__B4" and ver18 for "pi0kpsig0__B4_F1"
root files are in:
/cache/halld/RunPeriod-2018-08/analysis/ver17/tree_pi0kpsig0__B4/merged/
/cache/halld/RunPeriod-2018-08/analysis/ver18/tree_pi0kpsig0__B4_F1/merged/

MC - produced using MCWrapper - project id 2612 with software
Version Set:recon-2018_08-ver02_24.xml
halld_recon Version:recon-2018_08-ver02.8
halld_sim Version:4.42.0
Analysis Launch Emulation Version:analysis-2018_08-ver17.xml
output path - /cache/halld/gluex_simulations/REQUESTED_MC/Sigma0_pi0_2018_Fall_20220715094401am/

Any comments and suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Nilanga

@niwgit
Copy link
Author

niwgit commented Nov 16, 2022

I looked at few more kinematic fit options in data and plot the z-vertex distribution for Lambda. I was trying to see whether constraining Sigma0 mass or both Lambda, Sigma0 masses in the kinematic fit with the vertex fit lead to an issue with Lambda z-vertex.

But from the plots I don't see such an effect.

Lambda_z_vertex_kinfit_options_data

@jrstevenjlab
Copy link
Contributor

For the record, in discussions with others about reactions with Cascades I was reminded of another (possibly related) issue where two neutral particles come from a displaced vertex and many events have CL=1 i.e. chi^2=0

This was seen previously by Chandra (see slide 9 of https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0047/004734/003/Fall2020CollaborationmeetingPresentation.pdf) and Brandon (see slide 24 of https://halldweb.jlab.org/DocDB/0057/005750/001/CollabMeeting922.pdf)

Since the z-vertex showed such pathological behavior in Nilanga's case it's suggested that the same plots be made for the Cascade channels with and without the vertex constraint in the KinFit for comparison.

@jrstevenjlab
Copy link
Contributor

@sdobbs reminded us that there is a z-vertex binning for how combos are composed with BCAL photons whose kinematics can depend significantly on the z-vertex location. The definition is in https://github.com/JeffersonLab/halld_recon/blob/master/src/libraries/ANALYSIS/DSourceComboTimeHandler.h#L139 where the bins are 10 cm wide and the central bin is in the middle of the target. This matches the location of structure observed by Nilanga rather well.

@niwgit
Copy link
Author

niwgit commented Dec 15, 2022

@sdobbs and @jrstevenjlab, thanks for the information.

I made a plot for Lambda z-vertex following suggestion by Susan at the cross section meeting on 12/05/2022 to look at the events for E_gamma3 > 100 MeV (i.e for photons from Sigma0 decay).

It seems the strange behavior of z-vertex of Lambda is not directly caused by low energy photons.

Lambda_z_vertex_pi0kpsig0__B4_data_E_gamma3_100MeV_cut

@aaust
Copy link
Contributor

aaust commented Mar 8, 2023

Hi Nilanga, I am willing to look at this from the analysis library side, but I need to be able to reproduce this effect. Can you please summarize the cuts you apply to arrive at the Kp or Lambda z-vertex distribution? A simple DSelector which just produces a histogram showing the vertex distribution with this effect would be immensely helpful.

@niwgit
Copy link
Author

niwgit commented Mar 8, 2023

Hi Alex, Thanks for looking into this. You can use this DSelector to reproduce the Lambda z-vertex distribution. The relevant histogram in the code is "dHist_z_Lambda".

/work/halld2/home/nwickjlb/analysis/Lambda_1405/above_6_5GeV/analysis_note/DSelector_pi0kpsig0.C

@sdobbs sdobbs self-assigned this Nov 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants