You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @Janghyun1230
I trained the model based on vctk dataset (by reproducing your work).
As for inference, I am trying to verify speakers from LibriSpeech dataset. I obtained bizarre results each time. For instance, below are results of the same speaker (I splitted the *.wav of this speaker in two different folders and I feed them to the model). Hence, N=2 (but in real we have the same speaker) and M=4 utterances. The results below indicate that the model failed to detect that we deal with the same speaker.
Do you have any explanation of this ? should I try to train the model on a bigger dataset in order to get better results ?
inference time for 16 utterences : 0.18s
[[[0.87 0.29]
[0.79 0.07]
[0.93 0.24]
[0.81 0.17]]
[[0.42 0.89]
[0.4 0.81]
[0.53 0.73]
[0.52 0.62]]]
EER : 0.00 (thres:0.54, FAR:0.00, FRR:0.00)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tonytonyissaissa
changed the title
weird inference results for similar spekers
weird inference results for similar speakers
Feb 7, 2019
Hi @Janghyun1230
I trained the model based on vctk dataset (by reproducing your work).
As for inference, I am trying to verify speakers from LibriSpeech dataset. I obtained bizarre results each time. For instance, below are results of the same speaker (I splitted the *.wav of this speaker in two different folders and I feed them to the model). Hence, N=2 (but in real we have the same speaker) and M=4 utterances. The results below indicate that the model failed to detect that we deal with the same speaker.
Do you have any explanation of this ? should I try to train the model on a bigger dataset in order to get better results ?
inference time for 16 utterences : 0.18s
[[[0.87 0.29]
[0.79 0.07]
[0.93 0.24]
[0.81 0.17]]
[[0.42 0.89]
[0.4 0.81]
[0.53 0.73]
[0.52 0.62]]]
EER : 0.00 (thres:0.54, FAR:0.00, FRR:0.00)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: