Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on standard binary conv implementation in PyTorch. #74

Open
killawhale2 opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Question on standard binary conv implementation in PyTorch. #74

killawhale2 opened this issue Jun 10, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@killawhale2
Copy link

First of all, thank you for your hard work in providing the community with such a good framework!
I've been digging through many binary network papers & repos because I want to find an efficient implementation in PyTorch. I've taken a look at the standard binary convolution provided here: https://gist.github.com/daquexian/7db1e7f1e0a92ab13ac1ad028233a9eb#file-binary_conv-py-L32.
I was wondering why the SignWeight does not have the same backward as SignSTE.
To my understanding, the same SignSTE should be applied to both the activations and the weights for backprop.
Any clarification or further discussion on this would be greatly helpful.
Thank you in advance!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant