Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Add Alert Processing Rules #33

Open
brmcmill opened this issue Jan 27, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Feature Request: Add Alert Processing Rules #33

brmcmill opened this issue Jan 27, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@brmcmill
Copy link

I think adding some Alert Processing Rules may help with facilitate the busy/noise some of these alerts will have especially for those environments that are used for Testing/Dev. We don't want immediately for things to suppress, but have an option to keep things less noisy where possible so customers can efficiently read/react to the alerts that come in.

@jamasten
Copy link
Collaborator

I wonder if it's worth removing the dimensions on this alert. That way if there's one or more issues, you only receive one alert until the issue is resolved. The customer would click the query in the email to see which host has an issue. Does that make sense?

@brmcmill
Copy link
Author

It does, we just really need something that is efficient and less busy. I had to disable a few alerts because they were spitting out too much information. To me they are warranted, but the customer was overthrown with too much to filter through.

@brmcmill
Copy link
Author

brmcmill commented Mar 9, 2023

Right now, we changed the Aggregation to 15 minutes instead of 5. Will continue to monitor.

@JCoreMS / @jamasten

@brmcmill
Copy link
Author

brmcmill commented Mar 20, 2023

Hey @JCoreMS / @jamasten , we're still running into the CPU/Memory alerts going crazy during builds. We're going to make sure these are disabled going forward when we're doing builds, then renable after. Is there anything else we can probably look at adjusting?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants