Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using rust for researchers: the good, the bad and the rusty #58

Open
dalonsoa opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Using rust for researchers: the good, the bad and the rusty #58

dalonsoa opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
post suggestion For post that could be published in the future and will need discussion

Comments

@dalonsoa
Copy link
Collaborator

dalonsoa commented Sep 23, 2024

There are obviously a million posts out there extolling the virtues of Rust, but what I'd like to do differently here is address people writing research software in particular. The general idea would be to look at "when to consider using Rust and why", but I think it's especially a good choice for projects that would otherwise be written in C/C++. I think it would be fun to compare and contrast Rust with modern C++, which has some of the same benefits. Even if we don't convince people to move to Rust, we could still encourage best practices for C++ (e.g. using smart pointers, dependency management with vcpkg etc.).

-- Alex

@dalonsoa dalonsoa changed the title Using rust for researchers: the good, the bad and the evil Using rust for researchers: the good, the bad and the rusty Sep 23, 2024
@dalonsoa dalonsoa added the post suggestion For post that could be published in the future and will need discussion label Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
post suggestion For post that could be published in the future and will need discussion
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants