Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't Reproduce CIFAR10 Test Image Results #24

Open
bri-davis opened this issue Dec 2, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Can't Reproduce CIFAR10 Test Image Results #24

bri-davis opened this issue Dec 2, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@bri-davis
Copy link

Testing Issue

I am unable to reproduce the cifar10 results seen in the paper while using the pre-trained weights. Any insight to what I might be doing wrong?

Setup

  1. I downloaded cifar10 data and placed it in ./dataset/cifar10
  2. I downloaded the pre-trained cifar10 weights and placed them in ./checkpoints/cifar10.
  3. I converted some cifar10 images to grayscale and put them in ./checkpoints/test
  4. I run the test script as follows:
    python test.py --dataset cifar10 --checkpoints-path ./checkpoints --test-input ./checkpoints/test --test-output ./checkpoints/output --gpu-ids 0

Results

The output is blotchy and not what I expected. Here are some example output images produced from the setup above:
Screen Shot 2019-12-01 at 1 23 24 PM

@karoly-hars
Copy link

@bri-davis
I have the same issue.

@yunhao1996
Copy link

@bri-davis
I have the same issue.

me too!!

@VladVin
Copy link

VladVin commented Apr 26, 2020

The same problem with Places365 model. Is there any special preprocessing? I tried grayscale images in ranges [0, 1] and [0, 255]. Both give nearly the same output. I'm guessing, there should be some preprocessing, but no information in the repo neither in the arcticle.

P.S. Test on an image not from the dataset:

tmp

@Chansi
Copy link

Chansi commented Jun 15, 2020

Same issue with the Places365 model

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants