-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
What is the state of Famous-Flex? #123
Comments
Hi Bardu. IjzerenHein is on a long holiday trip. Not sure what he's
|
@mysim1 So, what are your plans at https://arva.readme.io |
@bardu amongst a few:
We haven't put time in publishing a roadmap, but it's there are right now moving towards beta.3 release. |
Hi guys, I've been on a much needed vacation as Hans mentioned. I've just put an update in the main readme, regarding what's up next:
Let me know when you have any questions about this. cheers, |
Hein, this is great news, specifically I'm excited about a future support for SamsaraJS. All the best, |
Hi @IjzerenHein Welcome back! Really nice to see you're ready for the next steps. What's your opinion about Famo.us 3.5 or SamsaraJS? I've seen the roadmap of SamsaraJS and would actually love to see an optimisation roadmap instead of seeing a feature roadmap. Pushing down memory and CPU usage is key for future features. Like any people within the WebGL space could write on-top features for the Famo.us engine (Three.JS, SeriouslyJS). Likewise for MV* framework, done by others. For example: we've made Arva work on Smart TVs and preferably work with more a more efficient rendering engine to boost the experience. Likewise we've build a new Component Layout system which we are experimenting with using a decoration (not declarative) approach to optimise coding where we leverage famous-flex (which proves you have a solid architecture there). |
@IjzerenHein Could you please provide your thoughts about the future of famous-flex?
It is an excellent framework, however, I'm wondering whether there will be any further development, bug fixes, etc.?
Is there a possibility to support SamsaraJS instead of famous v0.3.x in the near future? I just asking since SamsaraJS looks promising and is under active development.
Thanks in advance for your clarification.
Stephan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: