-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test for 3D coordinates in GML #12
Comments
sMorrone
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2019
will upload two different testcases for 3D points -one test file will have both srsName and srsDimension attributes and the other will have no srsDimension . see issue #12
sMorrone
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2019
3D point AD example - only srsName attribute set for geometry. See #12
sMorrone
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2019
3D polygons PS example - only srsName attribute set. see #12
sMorrone
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2019
3D lines TN example - only srsName attribute set - see #12
Indeed the issue is present for lines and polygons. Conversely, point geometries are correctly recognised as 'POINTZ' no matter the srsDimension attribute is specified or not. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Regarding the test for 3D coordinates in GML: I would like to suggest to split the test into two, so that the following 2 scenarios are checked:
See the following tests with ogrinfo:
Correct result:
LINESTRING (711530.29 6190097.44,711518.28 6190116.1)
Correct result:
LINESTRING Z (711530.29 6190097.44 31.24,711518.28 6190116.1 31.27)
Incorrect result!:
LINESTRING (711530.29 6190097.44,31.24 711518.28,6190116.1 31.27)
The expected result is
LINESTRING Z (711530.29 6190097.44 31.24,711518.28 6190116.1 31.27)
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: