Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate possible neighborhood map issues #160

Open
MirandaEcho opened this issue Feb 19, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Investigate possible neighborhood map issues #160

MirandaEcho opened this issue Feb 19, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@MirandaEcho
Copy link
Collaborator

"(In addition, one oddity I am only now noticing, both on staging and on the live site, is that on the Mapping the Future neighborhood pages it says the color that that neighborhood is coded in on the MTF map"

We responded that it looks like its been that way for a while, and Jarrett responded:

"As for the indication of the map color on the neighborhood page (not on the map itself), yes, it has traditionally been there -- but with a little colored dot, which looked slightly less odd. If it's easier to change the color word to the key word (e.g. Yellow becomes Proposal in Approval Process) than it is to remove the word altogether, that'd be fine."

See if we can reproduce what he's talking about and figure out what's going on.

@MirandaEcho MirandaEcho added this to the CITY-009 - SoW milestone Feb 19, 2020
@joshdarby
Copy link

@MirandaEcho Is this what we're talking about?

Screen Shot 2020-02-19 at 2 36 00 PM

@joshdarby
Copy link

If so, it'd be easiest to just remove it altogether by deleting this line:

<div class="zone-w-status"><div class="circle <?php echo $status; ?>"></div><?php echo ucfirst( $status ); ?></div>

@MirandaEcho
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@joshdarby Yes, please do so. Thanks!

@joshdarby
Copy link

@MirandaEcho This is also deployed to staging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants