-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Python path probably not set correctly when installing nest-simulator/3.3 #53
Comments
Not sure about the exact background here, but maybe a symlink
Seems it won't look into |
It looks like this automatic expansion does not work, not even with the symlink. The
If I add the tail to
Is there a good variable to use for getting the By the way, during the installation, I get this error and I am not sure if this is expected:
The installcheck still does not run with |
The exception is expected if not installed with an activated venv or within conda. That is also part of the In general Python package installs are difficult to handle with a non-pip package manager and many systems have worked around kinks and quirks. Builder does not have a magic bullet either. I think @ackurth had a trick to do it, I also vaguely remember something in the NEST issues or pull-requests… need to search for it… nest-simulator:#1959 has some of the path calculation in it, maybe this hint's a the right place already. |
I suggest in Pull Request #55 to use the TCL command
|
Thanks @akorgor, that looks very promising! The glob should be pretty unambiguous, since @jhnnsnk, I've added you as a reviewer to #55, hope that's ok. Please reassign, if you know someone more suitable. |
I installed nest-simulator/3.3 on JURECA DC with the loaded modules:
As a plan file, I used the the one for version 3.0 as an example. The installation worked fine, but the install check did not run. If the install check is commented out, the module is created properly and can be loaded. Starting the SLI version of NEST with
nest
works, but the Python module is not available through the PYTHONPATH. I have verified that the Python module exists in lib64/python3.9/site-packages and that it works, but apparently the path is not set correctly such that it is not found.Do you @ackurth have an idea what could have gone wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: