You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ideally we would like to have a function which can check the registration quality at a glance - to quantitatively compare alternative preprocessing workflows to ours, but also different parameter specifications for our own workflows. This feature could also be used to automate parameter optimization for our registration. This may require quite a bit of work, but it would be a splendid occasion to implement some machine learning for neuroimaging (we have enough data for this) and may actually be unavoidable if manual optimization remains fruitless.
More details and a bit of backstory in a conversation on the ANTs repo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ideally we would like to have a function which can check the registration quality at a glance - to quantitatively compare alternative preprocessing workflows to ours, but also different parameter specifications for our own workflows. This feature could also be used to automate parameter optimization for our registration. This may require quite a bit of work, but it would be a splendid occasion to implement some machine learning for neuroimaging (we have enough data for this) and may actually be unavoidable if manual optimization remains fruitless.
More details and a bit of backstory in a conversation on the ANTs repo.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: