-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature clarification: cross-linker/cross-linked residue #420
Comments
Cross linker refers to the cross-likning agent used, as I infer from the definition and also the children terms indicate. Do you need a 'cross-linked residure' feature in the CV? There can be use cases for it, but it is not currently IMEx practice to capture cross-linked residues. |
On 10/31/19 7:31 AM, Pablo Porras wrote:
Corss linker refers to the cross-likning agent used, as I infer from the definition and also the children terms indicate. Do you need a 'cross-linked residure' feature in the CV? There can be use cases for it, but it is not currently IMEx practice to capture cross-linked residues.
my guess it's not captured b/c at the time the decision was made the
infrmation was not there (apart from special cases it is hard to
identify x-linked sites other then disulfides; this got changed with
MS development/accessibility). getting 'crosslinked residue/crosslink
site' term makes it possible to annotate these at all (at the moment
it is not possible).
the curation policy seems to be a separate issue that can be discussed
at the next imex meeting.
personally I think location of x-links is at least as valuable as
binding region info and, as there's not too many experiment to curate,
I don't have a problem curating these without formal imex requirement.
lukasz
…--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lukasz Salwinski PHONE: 310-825-1402
UCLA-DOE Institute FAX: 310-206-3914
UCLA, Los Angeles EMAIL: [email protected]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Sure, I agree with your argument. I am just asking if you need the term for curation outside IMEx boundaries. I just do not want to create the term if there is not actual use case for it. If your answer is a definitive 'yes', I'll create the term. |
There is a cross-linker (MI:0911) but no cross-linked residue. It is not clear how to use it. is it supposed to refer to cross-linked residue or actual cross-linker ? if latter (although I cannot come up with a use case) than a new term is needed in order to annotate cross-linking sites. Otherwise definition of the term got to be modified...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: