Create infisical-secrets-check.yml #6
Conversation
|
Review changes with |
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis PR adds a new GitHub Actions workflow that implements automated secrets scanning using Infisical. The workflow runs on pull requests and can be manually triggered. It scans the repository for potential secrets, generates both CSV and log outputs, and automatically comments the results on the PR. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
🛠️ Code Review Feedback
Overall, the PR looks good. Great job! 🚀👍 |
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file named Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub Actions
participant Infisical CLI
participant PR Commenter
User->>GitHub Actions: Trigger workflow
GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Checkout Repository
GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Set Infisical Package Source
GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Install Infisical
GitHub Actions->>Infisical CLI: Run Scan
Infisical CLI-->>GitHub Actions: Return Scan Results
GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Read Log File
GitHub Actions->>PR Commenter: Update Pull Request with Results
Warning Rate limit exceeded@korbit-ai[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
gstraccini
bot
added
the
☑️ auto-merge
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:
|
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diff
Identified Issues
Issue 1: Best PracticesExplanation: The workflow file uses File Path: Lines of Code: - name: Checkout repo
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0Proposed Code Fix: - name: Checkout repo
uses: actions/checkout@v3
with:
fetch-depth: 0Explanation of the Fix: The fix involves changing the version from Missing Tests
Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-reviewon this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolvecommand in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! Scan results: |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Consider adding checksum verification when downloading the setup script instead of directly piping to bash with sudo, to ensure supply chain security
- There are two steps with identical names 'Read secrets-result.log' - consider renaming the second one to 'Read secrets-result.csv' to match its actual purpose
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟡 Security: 1 issue found
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
|
|
||
| - name: Set Infisical package source | ||
| shell: bash | ||
| run: curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/infisical/infisical-cli/setup.deb.sh' | sudo -E bash |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚨 suggestion (security): Consider adding additional security measures to the curl command
Add --proto '=https' and consider implementing checksum verification for the downloaded script to ensure integrity
| run: curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/infisical/infisical-cli/setup.deb.sh' | sudo -E bash | |
| run: | | |
| curl -1sLf --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/infisical/infisical-cli/setup.deb.sh' > setup.deb.sh | |
| echo "$(curl -1sLf 'https://dl.cloudsmith.io/public/infisical/infisical-cli/setup.deb.sh.sha256')" setup.deb.sh | sha256sum --check | |
| sudo -E bash setup.deb.sh | |
| rm setup.deb.sh |
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Summary by Sourcery
CI:
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add a GitHub Actions workflow to check for secret leaks using Infisical during pull requests.
Why are these changes being made?
To ensure that sensitive information is not accidentally exposed in the codebase by integrating an automated secrets scanning process, thereby enhancing the security measures in place for our repositories. This approach uses Infisical's CLI tool to detect leaks and provides detailed reports as comments in the PR if any issues are found.
Summary by CodeRabbit