Simplify Infisical secrets check workflow in GitHub Actions #48
Conversation
|
Review changes with SemanticDiff. |
|
Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR |
|
You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on October 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console. |
## 📑 Description
- Updated infisical-secrets-check.yml file.
## ✅ Checks
- [x] My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
- [ ] My code requires changes to the documentation
- [x] All the tests have passed
## ☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No
## ℹ Additional Information
- The action "Infisical secrets check" has been updated. |
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow file for Infisical secrets checking. The main change is replacing a series of manual steps with a single action, simplifying the workflow and potentially improving its reliability and maintainability. File-Level Changes
Tips
|
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diff
Identified Issues
Missing Tests for the Incoming ChangesThe proposed change simplifies the workflow by using a pre-built GitHub Action for Infisical secrets check. Since this is a workflow configuration change, specific tests are not applicable. However, it is essential to ensure that the new action works as expected:
By performing these steps, you can validate that the new GitHub Action integration is functioning correctly and providing the expected results. Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
penify-dev
bot
changed the title
PR Review 🔍
|
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs8:56PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
8:56PM INF 48 commits scanned.
8:56PM INF scan completed in 66.6ms
8:56PM INF no leaks found
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
PR Code Suggestions ✨
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!
Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.
Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-reviewcommand in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-descriptioncommand in any comment on your PR- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions ✅ Issue Categories
Category Enabled Naming ✅ Database Operations ✅ Documentation ✅ Logging ✅ Error Handling ✅ Systems and Environment ✅ Objects and Data Structures ✅ Tests ❌ Readability and Maintainability ✅ Asynchronous Processing ✅ Design Patterns ✅ Third-Party Libraries ✅ Performance ✅ Security ✅ Functionality ✅ Feedback and Support
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
User description
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Note
I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.
Description
Changes walkthrough 📝
infisical-secrets-check.yml
Simplify Infisical secrets check workflow.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
check.
Summary by Sourcery
Simplify the Infisical secrets check workflow by using a dedicated GitHub Action instead of custom script steps.
CI: