-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump xunit from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1 #76
Conversation
Bumps [xunit](https://github.com/xunit/xunit) from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1. - [Commits](xunit/xunit@2.9.0...2.9.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: xunit dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
The following labels could not be found: |
By default, I don't review pull requests opened by bots. If you would like me to review this pull request anyway, you can request a review via the |
Review changes with SemanticDiff. |
👋 Hi there!Everything looks good!
|
Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:
Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:
|
Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. 🎉 To get the most out of Senior Dev, please sign up in our Web App, connect your GitHub account, and add/join your organization GuilhermeStracini. After that, you will receive code reviews beginning on your next opened PR. 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have skipped reviewing this pull request. It seems to have been created by a bot (hey, dependabot[bot]!). We assume it knows what it's doing!
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Feedback:
This change looks good to merge. |
Please double check the following review of the pull request:Issues counts
Changes in the diff
Identified IssuesNo issues were identified in the proposed changes since the diff is empty. ExplanationSince the diff is empty, there are no code changes to review. The pull request title indicates a version bump for the xunit dependency from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1. This typically implies minor improvements or bug fixes in the xunit library itself, which should not affect the existing codebase. Missing TestsNo new tests are required as there are no changes to the codebase. However, it is recommended to run the existing test suite to ensure that the version bump does not introduce any regressions. Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Automatically approved by gstraccini[bot]
@dependabot squash and merge |
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! Scan results:
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Bumps xunit from 2.9.0 to 2.9.1.
Commits
bb7c3e4
v2.9.15d70d25
#3028: Support IGrouping<TKey,TValue> in Assert.Equivalent (v2)ed6e05b
Add support for IGrouping<,> in ArgumentFormatter, assuming it's safe to re-e...d97c7f8
Restore TestInvoker<T>.GetTaskFromResult (forwards to AsyncUtility.TryConvert...416ed81
#3021: Add overload of Assert.Equal to resolve compiler ambiguity6b86235
Add Assert.Equivalent support for evaluating Lazy<T>aadff05
Updated build table in README1949c78
Missing <properties> wrapper in JUnit output7dceffa
#2979: Update JUnitXml.xslt, based on https://github.com/testmoapp/junitxml?t...935af73
Latest assertion testsDependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase
.Dependabot will merge this PR once CI passes on it, as requested by @guibranco.
Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebase
will rebase this PR@dependabot recreate
will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot merge
will merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot squash and merge
will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it@dependabot cancel merge
will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging@dependabot reopen
will reopen this PR if it is closed@dependabot close
will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions
will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major version
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor version
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependency
will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)