You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would you accept a PR explicitly stating the ISO number that has been issued to this work, and perhaps linking to the relevant ISO page where curious people can see it?
I have no interest in paying for PDF of a standard that is freely avaiable for me to download, but it might be relevant for others, and it took me a bit of research online to find what the ISO number might be.
I'd like to others (and my future self) the hassle of looking up the number if possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi folks,
I just came off a call with someone when talking about the SCI being an ISO standard, and I was asked which ISO number the SCI standard had.
I think the ISO number might be 21031:2024, based on the preview linked below:
https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso-iec:21031:ed-1:v1:en
...and a screenshot on the ISO website:
However, I couldn't find any real mention of this number in the main github repo, nor in the article about acheiving ISO status:
https://greensoftware.foundation/articles/sci-specification-achieves-iso-standard-status
Would you accept a PR explicitly stating the ISO number that has been issued to this work, and perhaps linking to the relevant ISO page where curious people can see it?
I have no interest in paying for PDF of a standard that is freely avaiable for me to download, but it might be relevant for others, and it took me a bit of research online to find what the ISO number might be.
I'd like to others (and my future self) the hassle of looking up the number if possible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: