-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
Dynamic Contributors List #25
Comments
Great idea. I will come up with a few options for us to have a look at. I agree with making all contributors (extenders/helpers/contributors), but perhaps just highlighting where they have contributed. |
Great stuff mate! This will really help us thank/acknowledge people. On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Björn Holdt [email protected]:
|
The home page looks great. I love the animation that is there and how its working. Just a quick question, are we still needing to update the UI list of contributors on the Community page? |
Thanks for picking that one up. This page also needs to be made dynamic. On Friday, February 7, 2014, Anthony van der Hoorn [email protected]
|
Ok great. Just wanted to make sure. On 7 February 2014 09:27, Björn Holdt [email protected] wrote:
|
I'll have a look at making that page dynamic too, now the homepage is out of the way.
|
It'd be awesome if the listing of contributors on the home page and community page was dynamically updated from GitHub's API
I think there should be several listings:
.json
?) and for now contain @avanderhoorn and @nikmd23, along with our Twitter handles..json
file?) and for now should contain @CGijbels and @bholdt along with their Twitter handles.Glimpse
somewhere in their dependency tree.We already have a bunch of NuGet info that drives the Gallery page. We can leverage that to generate this list.
To be honest, number 4 and 5 are "nice to haves", and we can probably even think of a 6th or 7th category if we tried hard enough.
Personally, I don't like separating out extenders/helpers. They are all contributors making the Glimpse community better in their own way. However, we'd end up with duplicates in the list (because many people contribute in several systems) so separating them into different groupings skirts the issue.
Lastly, this list will be pretty large and continually grow. On the home page we should limit the number we show to 11, starting with the reviewers, then committers and finally the tops contributors by commit count. Let's leave the "Help us out, and get your name in lights." square the way it is.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: