You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For me, its not enough to tell if a script is in the list. Knowing if its paused or not would be helpful! I know I can just see if its in the list then make SURE its paused, but... Ooh, what if there was a way to define safe pausing within a script? #scriptpause 0 to make sure that it can't be stopped until its done what it needs to do, then #scriptpause 1 to allow pausing again? Which would only work using "all" or the script name itself; if using "#script pause" like for a macro, then that bypasses the #scriptpause stuff. Basically, the ability to deny another script from pausing a script, but not the user from manually pausing. And maybe a #scriptwait ability to then wait until a script is pausable? I got carried away I think, but that sounds groovy.
More robust #script command naming would be neat, too. Instead of one script at a time or "all", doing a pipe-separated list...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For me, its not enough to tell if a script is in the list. Knowing if its paused or not would be helpful! I know I can just see if its in the list then make SURE its paused, but... Ooh, what if there was a way to define safe pausing within a script? #scriptpause 0 to make sure that it can't be stopped until its done what it needs to do, then #scriptpause 1 to allow pausing again? Which would only work using "all" or the script name itself; if using "#script pause" like for a macro, then that bypasses the #scriptpause stuff. Basically, the ability to deny another script from pausing a script, but not the user from manually pausing. And maybe a #scriptwait ability to then wait until a script is pausable? I got carried away I think, but that sounds groovy.
More robust #script command naming would be neat, too. Instead of one script at a time or "all", doing a pipe-separated list...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: