You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description: The current implementation of the check flag feature does not provide a mechanism to display only failing checks, specific checks of interest, or exclude certain checks from the output. This results in a cluttered view of all checks, making it difficult for users to quickly identify issues that require attention.
Expected Behavior: When the check flag is invoked, it should allow users to specify parameters that filter the results to show only failing checks, include checks of interest, and exclude certain checks based on user-defined criteria. This would streamline the feedback process, enabling users to focus on relevant failures without being overwhelmed by other check results.
Actual Behavior: The current check flag outputs all checks regardless of their status, leading to confusion and a longer time required to identify and address issues.
Proposed Solution: Enhance the check flag feature to accept parameters that:
Show only failing checks.
Allow users to specify which checks to include in the output.
Provide an option to exclude certain checks from the output. This can be achieved by updating the command-line interface to accept filtering options, thereby improving usability and efficiency in identifying and resolving issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @Chezka109 can you please give several concrete examples of this in the form of screenshots or segments of program output that are connected to command-line arguments?
Description: The current implementation of the check flag feature does not provide a mechanism to display only failing checks, specific checks of interest, or exclude certain checks from the output. This results in a cluttered view of all checks, making it difficult for users to quickly identify issues that require attention.
Expected Behavior: When the check flag is invoked, it should allow users to specify parameters that filter the results to show only failing checks, include checks of interest, and exclude certain checks based on user-defined criteria. This would streamline the feedback process, enabling users to focus on relevant failures without being overwhelmed by other check results.
Actual Behavior: The current check flag outputs all checks regardless of their status, leading to confusion and a longer time required to identify and address issues.
Proposed Solution: Enhance the check flag feature to accept parameters that:
Show only failing checks.
Allow users to specify which checks to include in the output.
Provide an option to exclude certain checks from the output. This can be achieved by updating the command-line interface to accept filtering options, thereby improving usability and efficiency in identifying and resolving issues.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: