Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Each networked component must document its authentication method with remarks #933

Open
10 of 14 tasks
aj-stein-gsa opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #943
Open
10 of 14 tasks

Each networked component must document its authentication method with remarks #933

aj-stein-gsa opened this issue Nov 23, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #943

Comments

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

aj-stein-gsa commented Nov 23, 2024

Constraint Task

Each user authentication method property must have a remarks field for any networked component used in an interconnection or leveraged authorization.

Intended Outcome

Each user authentication property must have a remarks field

Syntax Type

This is required core OSCAL syntax.

Allowed Values

There are no relevant allowed values.

Metapath(s) to Content

<!-- Metapath context target -->
//component[ (@type='service'  and not(./prop[@name='leveraged-authorization-uuid']) and ./prop[@name='implementation-point' and @value='external']) or (@type='interconnection') or (@type='service' and ./prop[@name='implementation-point' and @value='internal'] and ./prop[@name='direction']) or (@type='software' and ./prop[@name='asset-type' and @value='cli'] and ./prop[@name='direction']) ]

<!-- Constraint requirement: Each user authentication property must have a remarks field -->
count(./prop[@name='authentication-method' and @ns='http://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal'])  = count(./prop[@name='authentication-method' and @ns='http://fedramp.gov/ns/oscal']/remarks)

Purpose of the OSCAL Content

No response

Dependencies

No response

Acceptance Criteria

  • All OSCAL adoption content affected by the change in this issue have been updated in accordance with the Documentation Standards.
    • Explanation is present and accurate
    • sample content is present and accurate
    • Metapath is present, accurate, and does not throw a syntax exception using oscal-cli metaschema metapath eval -e "expression".
  • All constraints associated with the review task have been created
  • The appropriate example OSCAL file is updated with content that demonstrates the FedRAMP-compliant OSCAL presentation.
  • The constraint conforms to the FedRAMP Constraint Style Guide.
    • All automated and manual review items that identify non-conformance are addressed; or technical leads (David Waltermire; AJ Stein) have approved the PR and “override” the style guide requirement.
  • Known good test content is created for unit testing.
  • Known bad test content is created for unit testing.
  • Unit testing is configured to run both known good and known bad test content examples.
  • Passing and failing unit tests, and corresponding test vectors in the form of known valid and invalid OSCAL test files, are created or updated for each constraint.
  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals section of the User Story in the issue.
  • This issue is referenced in the PR.

Other information

No response

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in FedRAMP Automation Nov 23, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🔖 Ready in FedRAMP Automation Nov 23, 2024
@Gabeblis Gabeblis self-assigned this Nov 27, 2024
@Gabeblis Gabeblis moved this from 🔖 Ready to 👀 In review in FedRAMP Automation Nov 27, 2024
@Gabeblis Gabeblis linked a pull request Nov 27, 2024 that will close this issue
7 tasks
@Rene2mt Rene2mt moved this from 👀 In review to 🚢 Ready to Ship in FedRAMP Automation Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🚢 Ready to Ship
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants