Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feedback]: Referencing UUIDs from upstream models #914

Open
1 of 12 tasks
Telos-sa opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
1 of 12 tasks

[Feedback]: Referencing UUIDs from upstream models #914

Telos-sa opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Telos-sa
Copy link

This is a ...

request - need something additional provided

This relates to ...

  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Registry
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL baselines
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Content
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP System Security Plans (SSP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Plans (SAP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Results (SAR)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M)
  • the FedRAMP SSP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAR OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP POA&M OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Validations

What is your feedback?

When generating the SAP and POA&M models, there is an error when trying to reference the UUID's from within an attached SSP.

The SSP is linked in the backmatter, and in the same directory as the SAP and POA&M. But trying to reference component uuid's, and inventory uuids fails across models.

Need to understand if these elements need to be locally defined in the model, in order to cross reference. Or if there is a prescribed structure or method to be able to extract and reference these uuid's downstream?

Where, exactly?

Validating downstream dependencies.

Other information

No response

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds like we need to discuss @resource-fragment and the applicability to the constraints for which you are seeing the error.

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

Per discussion today, @Telos-sa, can you please present one of the errors you have with import-ap that led to this report. It is meaningful and possibly actionable, but I want to know a good starting point and how we will incorporate this feedback and my suggestion in #914 (comment). Thanks!

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 🆕 New to 🛑 Blocked in FedRAMP Automation Nov 19, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

Marking blocked until we get feedback. Will check back periodically if there is no notification with reply or I miss to keep us honest. 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🛑 Blocked
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants