Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feedback]: Question. Are there any documents that align the FedRAMP Moderate Baseline Profile Parameters to the Parameters in the Word SSP Document? #624

Open
3 of 12 tasks
JoseGHdz opened this issue Aug 14, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@JoseGHdz
Copy link

JoseGHdz commented Aug 14, 2024

This is a Question

request - need something additional provided

This relates to ...

  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Registry
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL baselines
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Content
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP System Security Plans (SSP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Plans (SAP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Results (SAR)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M)
  • the FedRAMP SSP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAR OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP POA&M OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Validations

What is your feedback?

I am looking for any documentation that can help align the FedRAMP Moderate Baseline Profile to the FedRAMP SSP Word Document. The reason is that the Assignment Parameters in the Word Document are empty since the Moderate Baseline Profile only handles FedRAMP Parameters under "_opd" and "_prm". Any assistance on this is highly appreciated.

Where, exactly?

This is strictly for the set-parameters in the FedRAMP_rev5_MODERATE-baseline_profile.json to align with the SSP-Appendix-A-Moderate -FedRAMP-Security-Controls.docx

Other information

No response

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @JoseGHdz, I am reviewing old issues and noticed this one. Are you still encountering this issue? Perhaps we can focus one of the presentations in #653 later to focus on that, but would perhaps need a little more detail and an example control to focus on. Thanks again for reporting to us.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🔖 Ready
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants