From ec35eb5fcca6743ae2be8998203e55bc130f6cce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "A.J. Stein" Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:28:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] [skip ci] Fix FRR105 with feedback for #675 Address some feedback about wording and style of the unique ID req. --- src/validations/constraints/STYLE.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/validations/constraints/STYLE.md b/src/validations/constraints/STYLE.md index dcd834921..2e716ac4d 100644 --- a/src/validations/constraints/STYLE.md +++ b/src/validations/constraints/STYLE.md @@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ State: Required Categories: ID; Metadata -Guidance: Developers MUST define a Metaschema constraint with an `id` flag that is unique to all the constraints that FedRAMP maintains across all constraint documents. +Guidance: Developers MUST define a Metaschema constraint with an `id` flag, and the value of that `id` flag must be unique from all other constraint IDs across all constraint documents FedRAMP and NIST define in core OSCAL. [back to top](#summary)