Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align documents with SSP system-characteristics constraints #55

Closed
aj-stein-gsa opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Align documents with SSP system-characteristics constraints #55

aj-stein-gsa opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor

Align per the feedback GSA/fedramp-automation#610 (review) to merge those constraints and publish accurate docs.

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa self-assigned this Sep 10, 2024
aj-stein-gsa added a commit to aj-stein-gsa/automate.fedramp.gov that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2024
aj-stein-gsa added a commit to aj-stein-gsa/automate.fedramp.gov that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in FedRAMP Automation Sep 19, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🔖 Ready in FedRAMP Automation Sep 19, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 🔖 Ready to 🏗 In progress in FedRAMP Automation Sep 19, 2024
aj-stein-gsa added a commit to aj-stein-gsa/automate.fedramp.gov that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2024
@Rene2mt Rene2mt self-assigned this Oct 2, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since I am becoming oh so good and burning down my task list on GitHub, @Rene2mt has rightfully and graciously offered to work on the PR to ensure it gets done sooner or later.

@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa removed their assignment Oct 4, 2024
@Rene2mt
Copy link
Member

Rene2mt commented Oct 25, 2024

@Gabeblis I'm adding as as assignee.

You can reference PR #56 if needed, but I think you have newer content in your most recent PRs ( Add system-characteristics 'information-type' constraints GSA/fedramp-automation#685, #91) that addresses this issue.

@Rene2mt Rene2mt assigned Gabeblis and unassigned Rene2mt Oct 25, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa aj-stein-gsa moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in FedRAMP Automation Oct 28, 2024
@aj-stein-gsa
Copy link
Contributor Author

So we still need to touch up some other areas, particularly information-types CIA categorization per #689. @Gabeblis, should I create a separate issue for that?

To be fair and self-critical: I made this issue for me to work on a slate of things at the same time and didn't deliver, so there is no clear goals or AC because I knew, at the time, what I wanted to add but that is not any clearer now and there have been a few changes to the doc. So ... let me know.

@Gabeblis
Copy link
Contributor

So we still need to touch up some other areas, particularly information-types CIA categorization per #689. @Gabeblis, should I create a separate issue for that?

To be fair and self-critical: I made this issue for me to work on a slate of things at the same time and didn't deliver, so there is no clear goals or AC because I knew, at the time, what I wanted to add but that is not any clearer now and there have been a few changes to the doc. So ... let me know.

I do have an issue and draft PR currently open for this. That is my fault for dragging a bit on it. I'm working on touching up the documentation now so that I can transition it to ready for review. Just meshing some things together between feedback, what I have, and the documentation you had previously added for system characteristics assemblies in the (now closed) PR #56

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in FedRAMP Automation Oct 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.

3 participants