You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would have been quite useful if RGA could spit the number of cycles per functional group (SMEM, VMEM, SALU etc). Of course none can predict the actual cycles of instructions but an approximation could also work. Maybe the cycles reported by RGA can be modeled as if all memory is in cache or something. Doesn't need to be accurate.
Something like this for example:
SMEM
VMEM
...
100
20
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would have been quite useful if RGA could spit the number of cycles per functional group (SMEM, VMEM, SALU etc). Of course none can predict the actual cycles of instructions but an approximation could also work. Maybe the cycles reported by RGA can be modeled as if all memory is in cache or something. Doesn't need to be accurate.
Something like this for example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: