Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Mapping the JDK Version #4

Closed
Zeromax opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7
Closed

Mapping the JDK Version #4

Zeromax opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #7
Assignees
@nailujx86
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Zeromax
Copy link

Zeromax commented Jun 20, 2024

There is a problem in mapping the correct Java Version from the autoconfig to an existing project.

Given those JDK version in IntelliJ:
image

For example configuring the maven runner like this:

runner:
  jre: 22
  vmOptions: -Xmx4096m

Than IntelliJ will try to find a JDK mapping for 22 which does not exist. As I named it openjdk-22. That means I must rename it to 22, that the project is able to run and build.
@nailujx86 nailujx86 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 19, 2024
@nailujx86 nailujx86 self-assigned this Jul 19, 2024
@nailujx86 nailujx86 linked a pull request Jul 19, 2024 that will close this issue
Mapping and resolving JDK versions #7
Merged
@swesteme swesteme mentioned this issue Jul 19, 2024
Merged
swesteme pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2024
@nailujx86
Mapping and resolving JDK versions (#7)
75f66b6 
- if a JDK isn't found on the system a notification suggests the user to fix the JDK differently
- fixes issue #4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nailujx86 nailujx86

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Mapping and resolving JDK versions GEBIT/autoconfig-intellij-plugin
2 participants
@Zeromax @nailujx86