You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, putting equal parts Cohesion and Separation leads to math that vastly favours Cohesion, and requires Separation be given a decay_coefficient in the hundreds of thousands to millions range, and to give it a blended strength that is an order of magnitude stronger than the Cohesion.
Putting a 1:1 ratio of the two behaviors should cause close-to-zero amounts of acceleration, after an adjustment period, without large amounts of tweaking.
Though it should be done in a way that does not compromise the difference between Separation and Cohesion:
Cohesion should still be a behavior that tries to move towards the proximity's center of mass
Separation should still be a behavior that tries to move away from other units in the proximity, with closer units causing higher values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, putting equal parts Cohesion and Separation leads to math that vastly favours Cohesion, and requires Separation be given a decay_coefficient in the hundreds of thousands to millions range, and to give it a blended strength that is an order of magnitude stronger than the Cohesion.
Putting a 1:1 ratio of the two behaviors should cause close-to-zero amounts of acceleration, after an adjustment period, without large amounts of tweaking.
Though it should be done in a way that does not compromise the difference between Separation and Cohesion:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: