Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 14, 2024. It is now read-only.

Support for TypeORM #261

Open
ernaneluis opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Support for TypeORM #261

ernaneluis opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@ernaneluis
Copy link

My application we are using TypeORM for models https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm
, however, lumber generates sequelize models files, so it means we need to keep updated the squelize models to match the models from the code base written in typeORM.
problem: hard to keep track of 2 models.
Any change to support TypeORM models?

@johnmpotter
Copy link

johnmpotter commented Dec 5, 2019

We would love TypeORM support as well! I used Forest Admin in a Rails project and loved the direct integration, so my fingers are crossed for something similar with TypeORM. I really want to use Forest Admin over building our own solution but maintaining two models likely won't make sense in the long run. It's fine for reading data, but missing out on validations and transformations when writing is the real problem.

For reference, here's how TypeORM compares to Sequelize and Mongoose in terms of npm downloads:

Screen Shot 2019-12-05 at 9 47 46 AM

Sequelize and Mongoose are still the most used ORM's, but TypeORM is already at the download count that Sequelize was just a year and a half ago.

https://www.npmtrends.com/typeorm-vs-sequelize-vs-mongoose

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants