You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Although use of prefix Json made sense back in Jackson 1.0 era, we have tried to move in most cases.
One specific remaining case to fix is the abstract base classes JsonSerializer and JsonDeserializer.
Most of the code already talks about "value serializers" and "value deserializers" to refer to these (and to differentiate from "type" serializers/deserializers), so let's do:
JsonSerializer -> ValueSerializer
JsonDeserializer -> ValueDeserializer
This change may not be as drastic as it might at first seem since a vast majority of implementation will use more concrete base classes (StdSerializer, StdDeserializer); but there are still many places that need to be changed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
cowtowncoder
changed the title
Rename Json[Se]Deserializer as Value[De]Serializer in 3.0
Rename JsonDeserializer/JsonSerializer as ValueDeserializer/ValueSerializer in 3.0
Feb 8, 2021
Although use of prefix
Json
made sense back in Jackson 1.0 era, we have tried to move in most cases.One specific remaining case to fix is the abstract base classes
JsonSerializer
andJsonDeserializer
.Most of the code already talks about "value serializers" and "value deserializers" to refer to these (and to differentiate from "type" serializers/deserializers), so let's do:
JsonSerializer
->ValueSerializer
JsonDeserializer
->ValueDeserializer
This change may not be as drastic as it might at first seem since a vast majority of implementation will use more concrete base classes (
StdSerializer
,StdDeserializer
); but there are still many places that need to be changed.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: