Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Could we a slimmer version of pitchfork! #256

Open
jcchavezs opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Could we a slimmer version of pitchfork! #256

jcchavezs opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@jcchavezs
Copy link

Describe the feature

Make pitchfork slimmer

Rational

Pitchfork has great potential for different things, one of them being a sidecar for ingesting zipkin data. Ideally we should remove all the overhead possible so it consumes the less data possible. I think we could learn from the changes in https://github.com/openzipkin/zipkin/pull/2818/files to get an idea on how we could make pitchfork slimmer.

Ping @worldtiki @eleduardo

@worldtiki
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @jcchavezs :)

Imo there's 2 paths we could take:

  • A small lighter version of Pitchfork written in Go with the goal of being used as a sidecar. I'm pretty sure we can build something that would not be as performant but would be much more resource efficient.
  • A similar approach to the one you mentioned. I'm not sure how much effort we should put into this though since the savings would not be as significant. We could probably wait a bit more and explore an integration with Graalvm when it becomes more widely available for spring boot?

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

codefromthecrypt commented Aug 16, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants