We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
0690AC9663778E3CF38F06E589DE
GIB need 8 HCP to be positive after a 2C-opening, but I can live with 7
Here 2N deny 3S and 4H
So for IB the bid is 3H showing 4+ H and now South supports on 3 instead of rebidding the Spades
North now with a maximum cuebids
But it was the 4H bid that sent us astray.
I think after 2C opener should prefer to rebid a 6-card unless 4-card support
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You only analyze hands that resulted in a loss. You don't know how many winning imps you will lose after making changes.
Sorry, something went wrong.
I often see errors gain IMP, and I am fine with losing those imp, when the error is fixed. It is easier to see it is an error if it lose IMP.
I think my error reports are based on bridge knowledge more than winning or losing imps.
Playing 100s of boards a day I mainly focus on the obvious errors, like playing at the 5-level with 7 trumps.
I prefer everything to be configurable, but if not GIB is generally better than most
No branches or pull requests
0690AC9663778E3CF38F06E589DE
GIB need 8 HCP to be positive after a 2C-opening, but I can live with 7
Here 2N deny 3S and 4H
So for IB the bid is 3H showing 4+ H and now South supports on 3 instead of rebidding the Spades
North now with a maximum cuebids
But it was the 4H bid that sent us astray.
I think after 2C opener should prefer to rebid a 6-card unless 4-card support
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: