Are there plans to provide .deb, .rpm, ... library packages? #961
Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
From my point of view (I maintain the current binaries https://github.com/ERGO-Code/HiGHS#download as part of the JuMP project in Julia and am not part of the HiGHS team): Given the limited developer time of the core HiGHS team, I'd strongly recommend that they focus on HiGHS and leave packaging to the wider community. I don't think there are any technical reasons stopping someone else from doing it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes there no technical reasons nor license reasons, stopping anyone to upload the packaged versions. Or to put in a different way, I can try to get them into the corresponding repos since this would make my r-package development easier (on the CRAN side I would only be responsible for the code I wrote not also for the code HiGHS). But it would only make sense to do so if there not already plans in place for that and thats what I am asking currently about. :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We have no plans to provide these packages so you won't be duplicating any activity by developing them yourself. If they are useful for you then they may be for others, so contributing them is most welcome, thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since
cmake
makes it very easy to build.deb
+.rpm
packages I wonder if there are plans to release .deb, .rpm, ... libraries?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions