Replies: 5 comments
-
Sorry to take so long to respond, but please could you let us know instance names with an INDICATORS section |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Using this script in the root of
Output:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks :-) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
A user sent me a .lp file with indicator constraints recently because HiGHS failed silently when reading it. This got me thinking about how to implement them in general, as I had to guide her on how to model them explicitly so that HiGHS could solve her problem. Although they'd still have to be handled via "big-M" reformulation - rather than by handling them explicitly in the MIP solver - I'm inclined to add them to HiGHS |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Inspired by Erling Andersen's discussion of handling various MIP extensions as special cases of disjunctive constraints, implementing this in HiGHS is closer to becoming a reality. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Testing highs with miplib2017 models (right now only LP) there is several models that highs can not handle due to the "INDICATORS" section present on the mps file.
Looking here https://www.gams.com/latest/docs/UG_LanguageFeatures.html#UG_LanguageFeatures_IndicatorConstraints for the explanation of it.
Would be nice if HiGHS could implement it !
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions