You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For better extensibility it should be possible to have LQML extension functions in multiple namespaces. We say that we are inspired by http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#extensionFunctionshttp://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/ – there, function names are URIs (SPARQL) or namespace/localname pairs (XPath). This would require a prefix-binding syntax in LQML, so that functions could be invoked as prefix:functionName. I'd give this a low priority.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For better extensibility it should be possible to have LQML extension functions in multiple namespaces. We say that we are inspired by http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#extensionFunctions http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-30/ – there, function names are URIs (SPARQL) or namespace/localname pairs (XPath). This would require a prefix-binding syntax in LQML, so that functions could be invoked as
prefix:functionName
. I'd give this a low priority.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: