You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 22, 2024. It is now read-only.
In some sense, knowing all coordinates (x_i, y_i, z_i) of an N residue protein generates an N x N distance matrix. Then there are N^2 distance relations known between all residues of one chain, which is incredibly rich information.
I'm wondering how DeepRank-GNN preserves (if at all) the relations between each residue. The bioRxiv seems to suggest that only some of the Internal edges (residues on the same chain if they are within some distance cutoff) are kept. This means only a fraction of the N^2 distance relations are actually encoded as edge features. Does this affect model performance at all, and is this done so graphs fit into memory? My impression of DeepRank (CNN) is that by embedding into a 3-D grid, the spatial relations between all residues are preserved; is this not the case in DeepRank-GNN?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
In some sense, knowing all coordinates
(x_i, y_i, z_i)
of anN
residue protein generates anN x N
distance matrix. Then there areN^2
distance relations known between all residues of one chain, which is incredibly rich information.I'm wondering how DeepRank-GNN preserves (if at all) the relations between each residue. The bioRxiv seems to suggest that only some of the
Internal
edges (residues on the same chain if they are within some distance cutoff) are kept. This means only a fraction of theN^2
distance relations are actually encoded as edge features. Does this affect model performance at all, and is this done so graphs fit into memory? My impression of DeepRank (CNN) is that by embedding into a 3-D grid, the spatial relations between all residues are preserved; is this not the case in DeepRank-GNN?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: