Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 22, 2024. It is now read-only.

[Question] RE: Graph generation - distance matrix to fully connected graph #76

Open
b2jia opened this issue Sep 16, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@b2jia
Copy link

b2jia commented Sep 16, 2022

In some sense, knowing all coordinates (x_i, y_i, z_i) of an N residue protein generates an N x N distance matrix. Then there are N^2 distance relations known between all residues of one chain, which is incredibly rich information.

I'm wondering how DeepRank-GNN preserves (if at all) the relations between each residue. The bioRxiv seems to suggest that only some of the Internal edges (residues on the same chain if they are within some distance cutoff) are kept. This means only a fraction of the N^2 distance relations are actually encoded as edge features. Does this affect model performance at all, and is this done so graphs fit into memory? My impression of DeepRank (CNN) is that by embedding into a 3-D grid, the spatial relations between all residues are preserved; is this not the case in DeepRank-GNN?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant