Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is the WaveDiff implementation of Shape Metrics consistent with the "Euclidised" Shape Metrics? #98

Open
jeipollack opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Is the WaveDiff implementation of Shape Metrics consistent with the "Euclidised" Shape Metrics? #98

jeipollack opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jeipollack
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@jeipollack
Copy link
Contributor

jeipollack commented Dec 12, 2023 •
edited
Loading

To be confirmed.
If yes, do nothing.
If the answer is no, open issue to implement the Euclidised Shape Metrics.
@jeipollack jeipollack added the question Further information is requested label Dec 12, 2023
@jeipollack jeipollack self-assigned this Dec 12, 2023
@jeipollack jeipollack changed the title Is the WaveDiff implementation of Shape Metrics consistent the "Euclidised" Shape Metrics? Is the WaveDiff implementation of Shape Metrics consistent with the "Euclidised" Shape Metrics? Dec 18, 2023
@tobias-liaudat
Copy link
Member

I just read this, the answer is no as we WaveDiff used adaptive moments and Euclidised metric use a fixed window

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jeipollack jeipollack

Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jeipollack @tobias-liaudat