Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ensure licensing viability #7

Open
Claudius-Appel opened this issue Mar 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

ensure licensing viability #7

Claudius-Appel opened this issue Mar 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation meta stuff that is not part of the package itself, but pertaining to its development question Further information is requested

Comments

@Claudius-Appel
Copy link
Owner

Claudius-Appel commented Mar 17, 2024

consider:

questions to consider:

I call/dynamic-link functions from lgpl3-licensed packages (imager): can I license under MIT?
I call functions from RBioFormats, which is under GPL3
Bioformats itself is under GPL2.0.

rJava is under LGPL2.1

@Claudius-Appel Claudius-Appel pinned this issue Mar 17, 2024
@Claudius-Appel Claudius-Appel self-assigned this Mar 17, 2024
@Claudius-Appel Claudius-Appel added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation question Further information is requested labels Mar 17, 2024
@Claudius-Appel
Copy link
Owner Author

@Claudius-Appel Claudius-Appel removed their assignment Mar 22, 2024
@Claudius-Appel Claudius-Appel unpinned this issue Apr 4, 2024
@Claudius-Appel Claudius-Appel added the meta stuff that is not part of the package itself, but pertaining to its development label May 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation meta stuff that is not part of the package itself, but pertaining to its development question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant