feat(gsoc'24): Testcases for vue simulator [Vitest] #364
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for circuitverse ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
ESLint found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
|
@coderabbitai Could review this PR ? |
|
@tachyons: The PR introduces comprehensive test cases for the Vue simulator using Vitest, jsdom, and @vue/test-utils. The tests are well-structured and cover various components and functionalities, ensuring robust validation of the simulator's features. The use of Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Fetch the list of files changed in the PR to understand the scope of the changes.
git diff --name-only origin/main
# Retrieve the content of the test files added or modified in the PR.
fd --type f --exec cat {} \; --search-path $(git diff --name-only origin/main | grep -E '\.spec\.js$')
Length of output: 2116 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Fetch the content of the test files added or modified in the PR.
for file in $(git diff --name-only origin/main | grep -E '\.spec\.js$'); do
cat "$file"
done
Length of output: 29337 Actions performedComments resolved. |
WalkthroughThe changes introduce enhancements to the testing framework, improve the modularity of the codebase, and add new functionalities for combinational circuit analysis. Key updates include the addition of new test files, restructuring of existing JSON configurations, and modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
src/simulator/spec/testData/ripple-carry-adder.json (1)
74-85: Consider removing the redundant "results" array.The "results" array in the output object is identical to the "values" array. Since the "values" array already represents the expected output values, the "results" array is redundant and can be removed to simplify the test data structure.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant "results" array:
- "results": [ - "0000000000000000", - "1111111111111110", - "1111111111111111", - "1111111111111100", - "1111111111111101", - "1111111111111000", - "1111111111111001", - "0001111111111000", - "0001111111111001", - "1001011111111001" - ]src/simulator/src/node.js (1)
Line range hint
123-123: Consider adding error handling in thedeletemethod.The
deletemethod removes a node from various lists and performs cleanup. Consider adding error handling to ensure that operations do not fail silently if, for example, the node is not found in a list.-def delete(self): +def delete(self): + try: updateSimulationSet(true) this.deleted = true this.parent.scope.allNodes = this.parent.scope.allNodes.filter(x => x !== this) this.parent.scope.nodes = this.parent.scope.nodes.filter(x => x !== this) this.parent.scope.root.nodeList = this.parent.scope.root.nodeList.filter(x => x !== this) for (var i = 0; i < this.connections.length; i++) { this.connections[i].connections = this.connections[i].connections.filter(x => x !== this) this.connections[i].checkDeleted() } this.scope.timeStamp = new Date().getTime() wireToBeCheckedSet(1) forceResetNodesSet(true) scheduleUpdate() + except Exception as e: + showError(f"Error deleting node: {e}")
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (32)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vue (4 hunks)
- src/locales/i18n.ts (1 hunks)
- src/router/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/bitConvertor.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/circuits/Decoders-plexers-circuitdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/circuits/gates-circuitdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/circuits/misc-circuitdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/circuits/sequential-circuitdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/circuits/subCircuit-circuitdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/combinationalAnalysis.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/complexCircuit.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/data.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/decoders-plexers.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/gates.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/misc.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/sequential.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/subCircuit.spec.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/testData/alu-testdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/testData/decoders-plexers.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/testData/gates-testdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/testData/misc-testdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/testData/ripple-carry-adder.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/testData/sequential-testdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/testData/subCircuit-testdata.json (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/spec/vitestSetup.ts (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/src/combinationalAnalysis.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/src/data/project.ts (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/src/data/save.js (2 hunks)
- src/simulator/src/node.js (1 hunks)
- src/simulator/src/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- vite.config.ts (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/simulator/spec/testData/gates-testdata.json
- src/simulator/spec/vitestSetup.ts
Additional context used
GitHub Check: ESLint
src/simulator/spec/bitConvertor.spec.js
[failure] 11-11: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 15-15: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 19-19: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 20-20: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 23-23: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'describe' is not defined.
[failure] 27-27: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'beforeAll' is not defined.
[failure] 42-42: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 43-43: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 44-44: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 45-45: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 55-55: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 56-56: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 58-58: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 75-75: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'test' is not defined.
[failure] 76-76: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'expect' is not defined.
[failure] 79-79: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'test' is not defined.
[failure] 80-80: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'expect' is not defined.
[failure] 83-83: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'test' is not defined.
[failure] 86-86: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'expect' is not defined.src/simulator/spec/combinationalAnalysis.spec.js
[failure] 13-13: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 17-17: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 21-21: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 22-22: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 25-25: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'describe' is not defined.
[failure] 29-29: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'beforeAll' is not defined.
[failure] 44-44: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 45-45: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 46-46: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 47-47: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 57-57: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
Biome
src/simulator/src/utils.ts
[error] 229-229: isNaN is unsafe. It attempts a type coercion. Use Number.isNaN instead.
See the MDN documentation for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use Number.isNaN instead.(lint/suspicious/noGlobalIsNan)
src/simulator/src/combinationalAnalysis.js
[error] 136-136: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 165-165: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 182-182: Shouldn't redeclare 'k'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'k' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 184-184: Shouldn't redeclare 'index'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'index' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 186-186: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 203-203: Shouldn't redeclare 'j'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'j' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 204-204: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 204-205: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 206-206: Shouldn't redeclare 'v2'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v2' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 206-207: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 207-207: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 208-208: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 210-210: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 212-212: Shouldn't redeclare 'v2'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v2' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 219-219: Shouldn't redeclare 'out'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'out' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 225-225: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 227-227: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 315-315: eval() exposes to security risks and performance issues.
See the MDN web docs for more details.
Refactor the code so that it doesn't need to call eval().(lint/security/noGlobalEval)
Additional comments not posted (86)
src/router/index.ts (2)
5-5: Approve the export change for enhanced modularity.The change to export the
routesconstant is a positive modification that enhances the modularity and reusability of the routing configuration. This allows other parts of the application to directly reference and potentially manipulate the routes if necessary, which can be particularly useful in larger applications or those that require dynamic routing capabilities.
5-5: Ensure tracking of TODO comments.The router configuration includes TODO comments about future path updates. It's important to ensure these are tracked in your project management tools to not forget these planned changes. The setup of the router itself is standard and well-implemented.
vite.config.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM!The change to the
defineConfigfunction call allows for dynamic configuration, which can be beneficial for scenarios where the configuration may need to adapt based on runtime conditions.
39-48: LGTM! But verify the setup script.The new
testproperty enhances the testing capabilities of the Vite configuration by enabling global variables, specifying a simulated browser environment, inlining dependencies for testing components that rely onvuetify, and pointing to a setup script to configure the testing environment.The code changes are approved. However, ensure that the setup script exists at the specified path and that it correctly configures the testing environment.
Run the following script to verify the setup script:
Verification successful
Setup script verified successfully!
The setup script
vitestSetup.tsexists at the specified path and appears to correctly configure the testing environment by setting up necessary global variables and window properties. No issues were found with the setup script.
- The script is located at:
src/simulator/spec/vitestSetup.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the setup script exists and has the correct content. # Test: Check if the setup script exists. Expect: The file to exist. FILE_PATH="src/simulator/spec/vitestSetup.ts" if [ -f "$FILE_PATH" ]; then echo "Setup script exists at $FILE_PATH" else echo "Setup script does not exist at $FILE_PATH" exit 1 fi # Test: Check the content of the setup script. Expect: The file to contain the necessary setup code. cat $FILE_PATHLength of output: 524
src/simulator/spec/testData/subCircuit-testdata.json (2)
1-86: LGTM! The JSON structure is well-organized and comprehensive.The JSON file follows a clear and logical structure to represent the subcircuit's test data. It includes all the necessary information, such as the circuit type, title, input/output labels, bitwidths, and test case values. The hierarchical organization of the data makes it easy to parse and utilize in the testing framework.
1-86: LGTM! The test data comprehensively covers the full adder functionality.The test data provided for the full adder subcircuit is comprehensive and accurate. It includes all possible combinations of input values (0 and 1) for the 3 inputs (x, y, cin). The expected output values (sum and carry) are correctly calculated based on the full adder logic. This ensures that the subcircuit implementation is thoroughly tested against the expected behavior. The test cases are sufficient to validate the functionality of the full adder.
package.json (4)
13-13: LGTM!The new script entry
"test": "vitest"is correctly added to enable running tests using the Vitest framework.
50-50: LGTM!The new dependency
"@vue/test-utils": "^2.4.6"is correctly added to enable unit testing Vue components.
56-56: LGTM!The new dependency
"jsdom": "^24.1.1"is correctly added to enable simulating a browser environment during testing.
62-62: LGTM!The new dependency
"vitest": "^2.0.5"is correctly added for the Vitest testing framework.src/simulator/spec/subCircuit.spec.js (4)
1-13: LGTM!The import statements are correctly set up for the test file.
14-25: LGTM!The dependencies are correctly mocked using
vi.mock.
26-75: LGTM!The
beforeAllhook correctly sets up the test environment by initializing the necessary dependencies, mocking the required functions, and mounting the simulator component with the required plugins.
77-85: LGTM!The test cases cover the basic functionality of the subcircuit, ensuring that the data can be loaded without errors and the subcircuit is working as expected. The assertions are correctly made using the
expectfunction.src/simulator/spec/bitConvertor.spec.js (1)
1-9: Import statements are appropriate for the test setup.The imports correctly set up the necessary environment for testing the Vue components, including state management, routing, internationalization, and UI components.
src/simulator/spec/combinationalAnalysis.spec.js (3)
13-23: LGTM!The mocking of the
codemirrorandcodemirror-editor-vue3modules usingvi.mockis done correctly and provides the necessary functionality for testing.Tools
GitHub Check: ESLint
[failure] 13-13: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 17-17: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 21-21: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 22-22: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
29-74: LGTM!The setup in the
beforeAllhook is comprehensive and covers all the necessary dependencies for testing the simulator. Mounting thesimulatorcomponent and callingsetupensures a proper testing environment.Tools
GitHub Check: ESLint
[failure] 29-29: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'beforeAll' is not defined.
[failure] 44-44: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 45-45: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 46-46: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 47-47: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 57-57: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
76-91: LGTM!The test cases cover important aspects of combinational analysis, use
expectstatements to make assertions, and follow a clear and concise structure.src/simulator/spec/complexCircuit.spec.js (5)
1-14: LGTM!The import statements are correctly set up and cover all the necessary dependencies for testing.
16-26: LGTM!The mocking of
codemirrorandcodemirror-editor-vue3dependencies is correctly set up and allows for controlled behavior during testing.
32-77: LGTM!The
beforeAllhook correctly sets up the testing environment by initializing necessary instances, mocking functions, and mounting the simulator component.
79-86: LGTM!The test cases for the ripple carry adder circuit are correctly implemented and ensure the proper loading and functioning of the circuit.
88-95: LGTM!The test cases for the ALU circuit are correctly implemented and ensure the proper loading and functioning of the circuit.
src/simulator/spec/sequential.spec.js (4)
1-13: Review of Imports and Initial SetupThe file starts by importing necessary modules and components for the test environment. This includes setup functions, data loading utilities, test data, Vue-related libraries, and the simulator component itself. The structure is logical and well-organized, ensuring that all necessary dependencies are available for the tests.
- Correctness: All imports are correctly named and paths are appropriately referenced.
- Maintainability: Using absolute paths with aliases (e.g.,
#/locales/i18n) enhances readability and maintainability.- Best Practice: Grouping Vue-related imports and separating them from utility imports would improve readability.
14-25: Mocking DependenciesThe use of
vi.mockto mockcodemirrorandcodemirror-editor-vue3is crucial for isolating the test environment from external dependencies. This approach prevents side effects in tests and focuses on testing the component's behavior in isolation.
- Correctness: The mocking strategy correctly replaces the necessary methods with jest functions, ensuring that the real implementations do not interfere with the test outcomes.
- Best Practice: It's good practice to comment on why specific mocks are used, especially for complex mocks like
fromTextArea.
26-75: Setup of Testing EnvironmentThe
beforeAllblock is used to set up the testing environment. This includes creating a Pinia store, setting up a router, and mounting the Vue component in a test DOM environment. This setup is comprehensive and covers all necessary aspects to ensure the component behaves as expected during tests.
- Performance: Consider lazy-loading some of the heavier dependencies if not all tests require them to speed up test execution.
- Best Practice: The creation of a DOM element and its manipulation is done correctly. However, encapsulating this setup in a separate function or utility file could enhance modularity and reusability.
77-105: Test Cases for Sequential ElementsEach test case is clearly defined and focuses on a specific functionality of sequential elements like flip-flops and latches. The use of
expectstatements to assert the behavior of the circuit simulations is appropriate and follows best practices for behavioral testing.
- Correctness: The tests correctly use the
runAllfunction to execute simulations and check the results.- Best Practice: Adding descriptions to each test case using comments or in the test name itself would improve readability and maintainability, especially for new contributors or when tests fail.
src/simulator/spec/gates.spec.js (7)
1-12: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
14-20: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
22-24: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
30-75: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
77-79: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
81-114: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
81-81: Also applies to: 86-86, 91-91, 96-96, 101-101, 106-106, 111-111src/simulator/spec/testData/ripple-carry-adder.json (1)
1-92: LGTM! The test data is well-structured and comprehensive.The JSON file follows the correct syntax and structure. The test data is well-organized, with clearly defined inputs and expected outputs. The test cases cover a range of input values and bit widths, providing good coverage for the ripple-carry adder.
src/simulator/spec/decoders-plexers.spec.js (4)
1-13: Review of Imports and Initial SetupThe imports and initial setup are well-structured and follow best practices for Vue and Vitest testing environments. The use of
pinia,vue-router, andvuetifyensures that the tests will run in an environment similar to the actual application, which is crucial for accurate testing.
- Line 9: The import of
i18nis particularly noteworthy as it aligns with the PR's objective to support internationalization, specifically the addition of Bengali language support.- Line 12: Importing the
simulator.vuecomponent directly is a good practice as it ensures that the component is tested in isolation.Overall, the setup is comprehensive and appears to be correctly configured for the intended tests.
14-25: Review of Mock ConfigurationsThe mocking of
codemirrorandcodemirror-editor-vue3is crucial for isolating the test environment from external dependencies. This approach prevents tests from failing due to issues outside the control of the test scope, such as third-party library updates or configuration changes.
- Lines 14-20: The mock for
codemirroris well implemented, ensuring that thefromTextAreamethod is replaced with a mock function. This is important for tests that involve text editing functionalities.- Lines 22-24: Similarly, mocking
defineSimpleModeofcodemirror-editor-vue3ensures that the tests do not fail due to the absence or malfunction of this editor feature in the testing environment.These mocks are appropriately used and contribute to the robustness of the test suite.
26-75: Review of Test Setup and Environment ConfigurationThe configuration of the testing environment within the
beforeAllhook is comprehensive and well thought out. It includes setting uppinia,router, and mounting thesimulatorcomponent, which are essential for testing Vue components that depend on global state management and routing.
- Lines 34-37: The setup of the Vue router with
createWebHistoryand predefined routes is correctly implemented. This setup is crucial for testing components that interact with the router.- Lines 39-63: The manipulation of the DOM and the creation of a range object are necessary for testing components that interact with the DOM or have specific rendering behaviors.
This setup ensures that the tests are executed in an environment that closely mimics the actual application, which is crucial for accurate and meaningful test results.
77-114: Review of Individual Test CasesThe test cases are well-structured and focus on specific functionalities of decoders and plexers. Each test case uses the
runAllfunction to execute a series of operations and then checks the results usingexpectstatements, which is a standard practice in modern JavaScript testing.
- Lines 77-79, 81-83, 86-88, 91-93, 96-98, 101-103, 106-108, 111-113: Each test case is focused on a specific component or functionality, such as Multiplexers, Demultiplexers, BitSelectors, MSB, LSB, Priority Encoder, and Decoder. The use of
expect().toBe()to verify the number of passed tests is appropriate and ensures that the tests are both specific and informative.These test cases are well-implemented and should provide good coverage and insights into the functionality and reliability of the components being tested.
src/simulator/spec/misc.spec.js (3)
1-25: LGTM! Import statements and mocking of dependencies are properly set up.The import statements and mocking of dependencies are correctly implemented to facilitate testing. The mocking of
codemirrorandcodemirror-editor-vue3modules ensures that the tests can run independently without relying on the actual implementation of these modules.
30-75: LGTM! ThebeforeAllhook is comprehensively setting up the testing environment.The
beforeAllhook is properly setting up the testing environment by initializing the necessary dependencies, such as the Pinia store, Vue router, and plugins. The mocking ofdocument.createRangeandglobalScopehelps in providing a controlled environment for testing. The call to thesetupfunction from the simulator ensures that the simulator is properly initialized before running the tests.
77-129: LGTM! The test cases for the miscellaneous elements are well-structured and comprehensive.The test cases cover a wide range of miscellaneous elements in the simulator, ensuring thorough validation of their functionality. The use of the
runAllfunction to execute the tests and theexpectstatement to verify the number of passed tests indicates a robust testing approach. The test cases are well-organized and maintain a consistent structure throughout.src/simulator/spec/data.spec.js (6)
1-1: Update import statements to match new testing framework.The import statement correctly reflects the transition from Jest to Vitest, which aligns with the PR's objective to enhance the testing framework. This change is crucial for ensuring that the test suite uses the correct functions and hooks provided by Vitest.
26-36: Refactor mocking ofCodeMirrorto align with Vitest.The mocking of
CodeMirrorhas been adapted to fit the new testing framework, Vitest. This is a critical update as it ensures that the tests can simulate the behavior of external libraries correctly under the new framework. The use ofvi.fn()for mocking functions is appropriate and follows best practices in modern JavaScript testing.
42-87: Ensure proper setup of testing environment using Vue tools.The setup block using
beforeAllis well-constructed, initializing necessary Vue plugins like Pinia and Vue Router, and setting up a test environment in the DOM. This setup is essential for testing Vue components in isolation and mimics a real application environment closely, which is beneficial for accurate testing.
90-95: Validate functionality of loading circuit data.The tests for loading circuit data (
gatesCircuitDataanddecoderCircuitData) are straightforward and effectively check that no errors are thrown during the process. This is a fundamental aspect of the simulator's functionality, ensuring that circuit data can be loaded correctly.
112-121: Test undo and redo functionalities thoroughly.The tests for undo and redo functionalities are well-structured, manipulating the global state to simulate user actions and checking the state after each operation. These tests are crucial for ensuring the reliability of these features in the simulator.
Also applies to: 127-136
139-169: Ensure robustness of project management and image saving functionalities.The tests covering project management functions (
newProject,clearProject,recoverProject,saveOffline,OpenOffline) and the image saving function (createSaveAsImgPrompt) are crucial for verifying the simulator's ability to handle user projects and data effectively. These tests are appropriately checking for errors and expected outcomes, which is vital for the reliability of these features.src/simulator/spec/testData/sequential-testdata.json (1)
1-250: Well-structured and consistent test data for sequential elements.The JSON file is well-organized and maintains a consistent structure across different sequential elements, which is crucial for automated testing. The use of "Untitled" as a title for each element might be a placeholder. If these titles are meant to be descriptive, consider updating them to reflect the specific functionality or scenario being tested. This will enhance the readability and usefulness of the test data.
src/components/DialogBox/CombinationalAnalysis.vue (4)
27-27: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
30-30: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The import statement aligns with the refactoring goal to consolidate logic into a more centralized module.
141-143: LGTM!The code changes are approved. The function call change aligns with the refactoring to relocate functionality.
295-295: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/simulator/spec/testData/decoders-plexers.json (1)
1-401: Comprehensive Review of JSON Test Data for Vue Simulator ComponentsThe JSON file is well-structured and appears to be correctly formatted. Each component (Multiplexers, Demultiplexers, Decoders, Priority Encoders, Bit Selectors, MSB, and LSB) is defined with appropriate properties such as type, title, groups, inputs, outputs, and bitWidth. Here are some specific observations and suggestions:
Consistency in Titles: Each component uses the same title "Decoders And Plexers". This is good for consistency but ensure it is intentional and correctly reflects the content.
Bit Width and Values Alignment: The
bitWidthproperty for each input and output matches the length of the binary values provided, which is crucial for accurate simulation tests. This alignment is well maintained throughout the JSON data.Number of Test Cases (
n): The propertyncorrectly reflects the number of test cases for each component, aligning with the length of the values arrays. This is important for ensuring that the tests cover all specified scenarios.Formatting and Readability: The JSON is formatted in a readable manner, which will facilitate easier maintenance and updates. Consider adding comments or descriptions if the JSON format supports it in the future or through documentation to explain each test case scenario, especially for complex components.
Validation of Data: Ensure that the test data is validated against the actual functionality of the Vue simulator components to confirm that the values and scenarios are realistic and cover edge cases.
Overall, the addition of this JSON file is a significant step towards enhancing the testing framework for the Vue simulator, aligning with the PR's objectives to improve reliability and functionality through structured testing practices.
src/simulator/src/combinationalAnalysis.js (4)
18-57: LGTM!The
performCombinationalAnalysisfunction looks good. It validates the inputs, processes them, and generates appropriate prompts based on the analysis results. The error handling for missing or invalid inputs improves the robustness of the code.
59-91: Great work on enhancing the circuit generation process!The
GenerateCircuitfunction introduces significant improvements:
- It utilizes a new data structure to manage the Boolean table data effectively.
- It employs a K-map-like minimization approach to optimize the circuit design.
These enhancements contribute to improved efficiency and optimized circuit generation.
Line range hint
330-334: LGTM!The
createCombinationalAnalysisPromptfunction looks good. It schedules a backup and sets the necessary flag in theSimulatorStoreto trigger the combinational analysis prompt.Tools
Biome
[error] 136-136: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 165-165: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 182-182: Shouldn't redeclare 'k'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'k' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 184-184: Shouldn't redeclare 'index'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'index' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 186-186: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 203-203: Shouldn't redeclare 'j'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'j' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 204-204: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 204-205: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 206-206: Shouldn't redeclare 'v2'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v2' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 206-207: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 207-207: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 208-208: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 210-210: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 212-212: Shouldn't redeclare 'v2'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v2' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 219-219: Shouldn't redeclare 'out'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'out' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 225-225: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 227-227: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 315-315: eval() exposes to security risks and performance issues.
See the MDN web docs for more details.
Refactor the code so that it doesn't need to call eval().(lint/security/noGlobalEval)
109-232: Static analysis hints reviewedThe static analysis tool flagged several issues related to variable redeclaration and usage before declaration within the
drawCombinationalAnalysisfunction. However, upon careful examination, these hints appear to be false positives.The variables in question are declared and used within different scopes or loops, so they do not interfere with each other. The code seems to be functioning as intended, and the variable names are appropriate within their respective contexts.
In this case, it is safe to ignore these specific static analysis hints as they do not indicate actual issues in the code.
Tools
Biome
[error] 136-136: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 165-165: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 182-182: Shouldn't redeclare 'k'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'k' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 184-184: Shouldn't redeclare 'index'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'index' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 186-186: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 203-203: Shouldn't redeclare 'j'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'j' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 204-204: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 204-205: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 206-206: Shouldn't redeclare 'v2'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v2' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 206-207: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 207-207: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 208-208: This variable is used before its declaration.
The variable is declared here:
(lint/correctness/noInvalidUseBeforeDeclaration)
[error] 210-210: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 212-212: Shouldn't redeclare 'v2'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v2' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 219-219: Shouldn't redeclare 'out'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'out' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 225-225: Shouldn't redeclare 'i'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'i' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
[error] 227-227: Shouldn't redeclare 'v'. Consider to delete it or rename it.
'v' is defined here:
(lint/suspicious/noRedeclare)
src/simulator/src/data/save.js (2)
72-74: LGTM! The optional chaining enhances robustness.The use of optional chaining (
tabs?.length) ensures that iftabsisnullorundefined, the loop will not throw an error. This enhances the robustness of thegetTabsOrderfunction against potential DOM changes.
378-378: LGTM! The optional chaining prevents runtime errors.The use of optional chaining (
document.querySelector('meta[name="csrf-token"]')?.getAttribute('content')) protects against scenarios where the CSRF token meta tag might not be present in the document. This prevents runtime errors by safely accessing thecontentattribute of a potentiallynullorundefinedelement.src/simulator/spec/circuits/gates-circuitdata.json (16)
2-2: LGTM!The
namefield is correctly set.
3-3: LGTM!The
timePeriodfield is correctly set.
4-4: LGTM!The
clockEnabledfield is correctly set.
5-5: LGTM!The
projectIdfield is correctly set.
6-6: LGTM!The
focussedCircuitfield is correctly set.
7-9: LGTM!The
orderedTabsfield is correctly set.
10-877: Reviewing thescopesfield in detail.The
scopesfield is a complex object that requires a detailed review of its sub-fields. Each sub-field will be reviewed separately in the following comments.
12-18: LGTM!The
layoutsub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set.
19-24: LGTM!The
verilogMetadatasub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set.
25-470: LGTM!The
allNodessub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set. The nodes are properly defined with their positions, types, and connections.
471-471: LGTM!The
idsub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set.
472-472: LGTM!The
namesub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set.
473-526: LGTM!The
Inputsub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set. The inputs are properly defined with their positions, labels, directions, and custom data.
527-689: LGTM!The
Outputsub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set. The outputs are properly defined with their positions, labels, directions, and custom data.
690-710: LGTM!The
NotGatesub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set. The NOT gate is properly defined with its position, label, direction, propagation delay, and custom data.
711-735: LGTM!The
OrGatesub-field of thescopesobject is correctly set. The OR gate is properly defined with its position, label, direction, propagation delay, and custom data.src/simulator/spec/circuits/subCircuit-circuitdata.json (4)
1-814: LGTM!The file structure and contents look good:
- The file is a well-structured JSON file.
- It contains useful metadata about the circuit.
- The "scopes" section contains the main circuit data.
- Each scope is well-structured with all the necessary properties.
12-335: LGTM!The "Half-adder" subcircuit scope looks good:
- It has the necessary inputs, outputs, gates, and nodes to implement a half-adder.
- The node coordinates and connections seem to be correct.
- The scope doesn't use any restricted circuit elements.
336-812: LGTM!The "Main" circuit scope looks good:
- It has the necessary inputs, outputs, gates, subcircuits, and nodes to implement a full-adder using two half-adders and an OR gate.
- The node coordinates, connections, and subcircuit instantiations seem to be correct.
- The scope doesn't use any restricted circuit elements.
1-814: LGTM!The
subCircuit-circuitdata.jsonfile looks good:
- The file structure and contents are well-organized.
- The "Half-adder" subcircuit scope is implemented correctly.
- The "Main" circuit scope is implemented correctly using two half-adder subcircuits and an OR gate.
- No restricted circuit elements are used.
The file is approved.
src/simulator/src/node.js (1)
258-258: Review the conditional logic change in thesaveObjectmethod.The change from
NODE_INTERMEDIATE2toNODE_INTERMEDIATEin thesaveObjectmethod suggests a simplification or correction in how node types are handled. Ensure this change is consistent with how node types are defined and used throughout the rest of the system.Verification successful
Consistent usage of
NODE_INTERMEDIATEconfirmed.The change from
NODE_INTERMEDIATE2toNODE_INTERMEDIATEin thesaveObjectmethod is consistent with the rest of the codebase, asNODE_INTERMEDIATEis the only constant used. No instances ofNODE_INTERMEDIATE2were found, indicating the change is appropriate and does not introduce any issues.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of NODE_INTERMEDIATE and NODE_INTERMEDIATE2 across the codebase. # Test: Search for NODE_INTERMEDIATE and NODE_INTERMEDIATE2 usage. Expect: Consistent usage of NODE_INTERMEDIATE. rg --type python -A 5 $'NODE_INTERMEDIATE|NODE_INTERMEDIATE2'Length of output: 93
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of NODE_INTERMEDIATE and NODE_INTERMEDIATE2 across the JavaScript codebase. # Test: Search for NODE_INTERMEDIATE and NODE_INTERMEDIATE2 usage. Expect: Consistent usage of NODE_INTERMEDIATE. rg --type js -A 5 $'NODE_INTERMEDIATE|NODE_INTERMEDIATE2'Length of output: 6403
src/simulator/spec/testData/misc-testdata.json (1)
1-959: Review of New Test Data FileThe new JSON file for test data is well-structured and appears to be correctly formatted. Each component is clearly defined with appropriate properties such as "type", "title", "groups", "inputs", "outputs", "bitWidth", "values", and "results". This structure should facilitate effective testing of the simulator's components.
Key Observations:
- The "type" property is consistently set to "comb", which likely indicates combinational logic components.
- The "bitWidth" and "values" arrays are correctly aligned with the expected data types and lengths.
- The "results" arrays match the "values" arrays, which is crucial for validating the expected outcomes in tests.
Suggestions:
- Ensure that all components required for the tests are included in this file.
- Verify that the "values" and "results" are correctly set up to reflect the expected behavior of the simulator components under test conditions.
- Consider adding more descriptive titles where "Untitled" is used, to enhance clarity and maintainability of the test data.
Overall, the file is well-prepared for integration into the testing framework, and no major issues are observed. It is recommended to proceed with using this test data in the simulator tests.
src/simulator/spec/circuits/Decoders-plexers-circuitdata.json (2)
5-5: Verify the impact of changing theprojectId.The
projectIdhas been changed from "RVvp1Qq4hf3eVcfUO7sE" to "hWmIAEfeaUjXbtHfKS15". This change might affect any integrations or references that rely on the original project ID. It's crucial to verify that all references to this project ID are updated accordingly or to understand the reason for this change if it's intended to reference a new project.Verification successful
Change of
projectIdis isolated.The
projectIdchange from "RVvp1Qq4hf3eVcfUO7sE" to "hWmIAEfeaUjXbtHfKS15" is isolated to the filesrc/simulator/spec/circuits/Decoders-plexers-circuitdata.json. There are no other references to the old project ID in the codebase. Ensure any external systems or documentation referencing the old project ID are updated if necessary.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the old project ID are updated or understand the reason for the change. # Test: Search for the old project ID. Expect: No occurrences of the old project ID. rg --type json -A 5 $'RVvp1Qq4hf3eVcfUO7sE'Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the old project ID across all file types to ensure no references are missed. rg 'RVvp1Qq4hf3eVcfUO7sE' -A 5 # Search for the new project ID across all file types to understand where it is being used. rg 'hWmIAEfeaUjXbtHfKS15' -A 5Length of output: 562
660-843: Ensure consistency and correctness in theInputandOutputconfigurations.The
InputandOutputsections have been modified with new parameters and connections. It's important to ensure that these changes are consistent with the overall design and functionality of the circuit. Verify that all new connections are correctly mapped and that the custom data fields are accurately configured to prevent any runtime errors or misconfigurations.Also applies to: 844-1143
src/simulator/spec/circuits/sequential-circuitdata.json (1)
1-1184: Validate JSON structure and review data integrity.The JSON file is well-structured and appears to be correctly formatted. However, due to the complexity and depth of the data, it is crucial to ensure that:
- All properties are correctly defined and necessary for the simulation.
- Connections between elements are logically consistent and complete.
- Labels and other user-facing strings are accurate and meaningful.
It's recommended to validate this JSON file against a schema if available, to ensure all required properties are present and correctly typed. Additionally, consider adding automated tests to verify the integrity of the data, especially if this file is expected to evolve or be used in different testing environments.
src/simulator/spec/circuits/misc-circuitdata.json (1)
1-1572: Validate JSON Structure and ContentThe JSON file appears to be well-structured and includes a comprehensive configuration for various circuit elements. Here are a few points to ensure the file is fully functional:
- Consistency: Ensure that all object types and properties are consistently named and used. This helps in maintaining a standard across the configuration file.
- Completeness: Verify that all necessary properties for the circuit elements are included. Each element like inputs, outputs, and gates should have all required properties defined, such as
direction,labelDirection,propagationDelay, etc.- Data Types: Check that the values assigned to properties are of the correct data type. For example,
propagationDelayshould be an integer,labelshould be a string, etc.- Redundancy: Look for any redundant entries or properties that might not be necessary. For instance, if two elements have the same configuration, consider if they can be combined or if the duplication is necessary for the circuit's functionality.
Overall, the file setup is crucial for the simulator's operation, and any error in this configuration could lead to unexpected behavior or failures in simulation. It's recommended to add a schema validation step in the development process to automatically check the correctness of such configuration files.
| @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import en from './en.json' | |||
| import hi from './hi.json' | |||
| import bn from './bn.json' | |||
|
|
|||
| const i18n = createI18n({ | |||
| export const i18n = createI18n({ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve the addition of the export keyword but suggest a refactor for export consistency.
The addition of the export keyword to the i18n constant is a positive change, enhancing the modularity and reusability of the i18n instance. However, having both named and default exports of the same constant can lead to confusion and inconsistencies in import statements across the project. Consider standardizing the export method to either named or default to maintain consistency and clarity in the codebase.
| vi.mock('codemirror', async (importOriginal) => { | ||
| const actual = await importOriginal(); | ||
| return { | ||
| ...actual, | ||
| fromTextArea: vi.fn(() => ({ setValue: () => { } })), | ||
| }; | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| vi.mock('codemirror-editor-vue3', () => ({ | ||
| defineSimpleMode: vi.fn(), | ||
| })); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mock setup is effective but requires addressing ESLint errors.
The mocks for 'codemirror' and 'codemirror-editor-vue3' are well-implemented to simulate their behavior. However, ESLint has flagged that 'vi' is not defined. To resolve this, ensure that 'vi' is declared as a global variable or properly imported.
Consider adding the following to address the ESLint errors:
/* global vi */Or, if using ES modules, ensure 'vi' is imported from 'vitest':
import { vi } from 'vitest';Tools
GitHub Check: ESLint
[failure] 11-11: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 15-15: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 19-19: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 20-20: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
| describe('data dir working', () => { | ||
| let pinia; | ||
| let router; | ||
|
|
||
| beforeAll(async () => { | ||
| pinia = createPinia(); | ||
| setActivePinia(pinia); | ||
|
|
||
| router = createRouter({ | ||
| history: createWebHistory(), | ||
| routes, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| const elem = document.createElement('div') | ||
|
|
||
| if (document.body) { | ||
| document.body.appendChild(elem) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| global.document.createRange = vi.fn(() => ({ | ||
| setEnd: vi.fn(), | ||
| setStart: vi.fn(), | ||
| getBoundingClientRect: vi.fn(() => ({ | ||
| x: 0, | ||
| y: 0, | ||
| width: 0, | ||
| height: 0, | ||
| top: 0, | ||
| right: 0, | ||
| bottom: 0, | ||
| left: 0, | ||
| })), | ||
| getClientRects: vi.fn(() => ({ | ||
| item: vi.fn(() => null), | ||
| length: 0, | ||
| [Symbol.iterator]: vi.fn(() => []), | ||
| })), | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| global.globalScope = global.globalScope || {}; | ||
|
|
||
| mount(simulator, { | ||
| global: { | ||
| plugins: [pinia, router, i18n, vuetify], | ||
| }, | ||
| attachTo: elem, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| setup(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Open BitConvertor Dialog | ||
| test('bitConvertor Dialog working', () => { | ||
| expect(() => bitConverterDialog()).not.toThrow(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('function setupBitConvertor working', () => { | ||
| expect(() => setupBitConvertor()).not.toThrow(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('function setBaseValues working', () => { | ||
| const randomBaseValue = Math.floor(Math.random() * 100); | ||
| console.log('Testing for Base Value --> ', randomBaseValue); | ||
| expect(() => setBaseValues(randomBaseValue)).not.toThrow(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test setup and cases are well-structured but consider improving isolation and cleanup.
The beforeAll setup is thorough, ensuring that the component operates in a fully simulated environment. The tests are simple and focus on ensuring that the functions do not throw exceptions, which is a good start for testing.
However, consider adding a afterAll hook to clean up after tests to prevent side effects between test cases, especially when dealing with global variables and DOM manipulations.
Add the following to improve test isolation and cleanup:
afterAll(() => {
document.body.removeChild(elem);
// Additional cleanup logic here
});Tools
GitHub Check: ESLint
[failure] 23-23: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'describe' is not defined.
[failure] 27-27: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'beforeAll' is not defined.
[failure] 42-42: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 43-43: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 44-44: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 45-45: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 55-55: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 56-56: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 58-58: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'vi' is not defined.
[failure] 75-75: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'test' is not defined.
[failure] 76-76: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'expect' is not defined.
[failure] 79-79: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'test' is not defined.
[failure] 80-80: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'expect' is not defined.
[failure] 83-83: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'test' is not defined.
[failure] 86-86: disallow the use of undeclared variables unless mentioned in
/*global */comments
'expect' is not defined.
| @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ | |||
| import { setup } from '../src/setup'; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address ESLint warnings about undeclared variables.
The ESLint warnings about undeclared variables vi, describe, and beforeAll can be suppressed by adding a /*global */ comment at the beginning of the file.
Add this comment at the beginning of the file:
/*global vi, describe, beforeAll */| input.state = input.state === 1 ? 0 : 1; | ||
| expect(() => scheduleBackup()).not.toThrow(); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('check if backup performed', () => { | ||
| expect(() => checkIfBackup(globalScope)).toBeTruthy() | ||
| }) | ||
| expect(checkIfBackup(globalScope)).toBeTruthy(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check backup functionality and state toggling.
The test for scheduling backups and checking if a backup was performed uses global state manipulation to simulate user interactions. This approach is practical for testing state-dependent features but should be accompanied by cleanup to ensure tests do not affect each other.
Consider adding cleanup logic in afterEach or afterAll hooks to reset the global state and prevent tests from interfering with each other.
| export function setupBitConvertor() { | ||
| $("#decimalInput").on('keyup', function () { | ||
| var x = parseInt($("#decimalInput").val(), 10); | ||
| setBaseValues(x); | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| $("#binaryInput").on('keyup', function () { | ||
| var inp = $("#binaryInput").val(); | ||
| var x; | ||
| if (inp.slice(0, 2) == '0b') | ||
| x = parseInt(inp.slice(2), 2); | ||
| else | ||
| x = parseInt(inp, 2); | ||
| setBaseValues(x); | ||
| }) | ||
| $("#bcdInput").on('keyup', function () { | ||
| var input = $("#bcdInput").val(); | ||
| var num = 0; | ||
| while (input.length % 4 !== 0){ | ||
| input = "0" + input; | ||
| } | ||
| if(input !== 0){ | ||
| var i = 0; | ||
| while (i < input.length / 4){ | ||
| if(parseInt(input.slice((4 * i), 4 * (i + 1)), 2) < 10) | ||
| num = num * 10 + parseInt(input.slice((4 * i), 4 * (i + 1)), 2); | ||
| else | ||
| return setBaseValues(NaN); | ||
| i++; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return setBaseValues(x); | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| $("#hexInput").on('keyup', function () { | ||
| var x = parseInt($("#hexInput").val(), 16); | ||
| setBaseValues(x); | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| $("#octalInput").on('keyup', function () { | ||
| var x = parseInt($("#octalInput").val(), 8); | ||
| setBaseValues(x); | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! But consider refactoring jQuery usage and extracting BCD input handling logic in a separate PR.
The code changes are approved. The function enhances the interactivity and functionality of the number conversion utilities.
However, please consider the following suggestions for further improvement:
-
The function uses jQuery to set up the event listeners, which is not ideal in a TypeScript codebase. Consider refactoring this to a more TypeScript-friendly approach in a separate PR.
-
The BCD input handling logic (line range 262-279) is complex and can be extracted into a separate function for better readability and maintainability. This will make the
setupBitConvertorfunction more concise and easier to understand.
| export function solveBooleanFunction(inputListNames, booleanExpression) { | ||
| let i | ||
| let j | ||
| output.value = [] | ||
|
|
||
| if ( | ||
| booleanExpression.match( | ||
| /[^ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz01+'() ]/g | ||
| ) != null | ||
| ) { | ||
| // alert('One of the characters is not allowed.') | ||
| confirmSingleOption('One of the characters is not allowed.') | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (inputListNames.length > 8) { | ||
| // alert('You can only have 8 variables at a time.') | ||
| confirmSingleOption('You can only have 8 variables at a time.') | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
| var matrix = [] | ||
| for (i = 0; i < inputListNames.length; i++) { | ||
| matrix[i] = new Array(inputListNames.length) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for (i = 0; i < inputListNames.length; i++) { | ||
| for (j = 0; j < 1 << inputListNames.length; j++) { | ||
| matrix[i][j] = +((j & (1 << (inputListNames.length - i - 1))) != 0) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| // generate equivalent expression by replacing input vars with possible combinations of o and 1 | ||
| for (i = 0; i < 2 ** inputListNames.length; i++) { | ||
| const data = [] | ||
| for (j = 0; j < inputListNames.length; j++) { | ||
| data[j] = | ||
| Math.floor(i / Math.pow(2, inputListNames.length - j - 1)) % 2 | ||
| } | ||
| let equation = booleanExpression | ||
| for (j = 0; j < inputListNames.length; j++) { | ||
| equation = equation.replace( | ||
| new RegExp(inputListNames[j], 'g'), | ||
| data[j] | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| output.value[i] = solve(equation) | ||
| } | ||
| // generates solution for the truth table of booleanexpression | ||
| function solve(equation) { | ||
| while (equation.indexOf('(') != -1) { | ||
| const start = equation.lastIndexOf('(') | ||
| const end = equation.indexOf(')', start) | ||
| if (start != -1) { | ||
| equation = | ||
| equation.substring(0, start) + | ||
| solve(equation.substring(start + 1, end)) + | ||
| equation.substring(end + 1) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| equation = equation.replace(/''/g, '') | ||
| equation = equation.replace(/0'/g, '1') | ||
| equation = equation.replace(/1'/g, '0') | ||
| for (let i = 0; i < equation.length - 1; i++) { | ||
| if ( | ||
| (equation[i] == '0' || equation[i] == '1') && | ||
| (equation[i + 1] == '0' || equation[i + 1] == '1') | ||
| ) { | ||
| equation = | ||
| equation.substring(0, i + 1) + | ||
| '*' + | ||
| equation.substring(i + 1, equation.length) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| try { | ||
| const safeEval = eval | ||
| const answer = safeEval(equation) | ||
| if (answer == 0) { | ||
| return 0 | ||
| } | ||
| if (answer > 0) { | ||
| return 1 | ||
| } | ||
| return '' | ||
| } catch (e) { | ||
| return '' | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice implementation of the Boolean expression solver!
The solveBooleanFunction function provides a valuable feature for evaluating Boolean expressions and generating truth tables. The validation checks for allowed characters and the limit on the number of input variables ensure the input is valid. The recursive processing of the Boolean expression allows for accurate computation of the output.
However, there is a security concern flagged by the static analysis tool:
The use of eval() in the solve function (line 315) exposes the code to potential security risks and performance issues. It is recommended to refactor the code to avoid the need for eval(). Consider alternative approaches such as parsing the equation and evaluating it using a custom implementation.
If you need help refactoring the code to eliminate the use of eval(), I'd be happy to assist. Let me know if you'd like me to provide a refactored version of the solve function.
Tools
Biome
[error] 315-315: eval() exposes to security risks and performance issues.
See the MDN web docs for more details.
Refactor the code so that it doesn't need to call eval().(lint/security/noGlobalEval)
| "title_x": 50, | ||
| "title_y": 13, | ||
| "titleEnabled": true | ||
| "name": "Decoder&Plexers", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider revising the component name for clarity.
The component name has been changed from "Decoders and Plexers" to "Decoder&Plexers". This change might cause confusion or issues with existing references or documentation. Consider using a more descriptive and consistent naming convention, such as "Decoders & Plexers" to maintain readability and clarity.
| { | ||
| "layout": { | ||
| "width": 100, | ||
| "height": 540, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the implications of the increased layout height.
The layout height has been increased from 280 to 540. This significant change suggests a more complex or expanded visual representation of the circuit. Ensure that this change is reflected appropriately in the UI and that it does not introduce any overflow or scaling issues on different devices or screen sizes.
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 48, | ||
| 57, | ||
| 60 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": 40, | ||
| "y": 0, | ||
| "type": 0, | ||
| "bitWidth": 4, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 49 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": 10, | ||
| "y": 0, | ||
| "type": 0, | ||
| "bitWidth": 1, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 50 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": -10, | ||
| "y": 0, | ||
| "type": 0, | ||
| "bitWidth": 4, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 57 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": 20, | ||
| "y": 0, | ||
| "type": 1, | ||
| "bitWidth": 4, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 58 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": 20, | ||
| "y": 20, | ||
| "type": 1, | ||
| "bitWidth": 1, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 59 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": 250, | ||
| "y": 410, | ||
| "type": 2, | ||
| "bitWidth": 4, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 51, | ||
| 54 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": 40, | ||
| "y": 0, | ||
| "type": 0, | ||
| "bitWidth": 4, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 55 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": 10, | ||
| "y": 0, | ||
| "type": 0, | ||
| "bitWidth": 1, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 56 | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "x": 40, | ||
| "y": 0, | ||
| "type": 1, | ||
| "bitWidth": 4, | ||
| "label": "", | ||
| "connections": [ | ||
| 43, | ||
| 51 | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Assess the expanded allNodes array for potential performance impacts.
The allNodes array has been significantly expanded with numerous new nodes defined, each with detailed specifications. This expansion enhances the circuit's functionality but could potentially impact the performance, especially in terms of loading times and memory usage. Consider implementing performance tests to ensure that the simulator remains efficient with these additions.
Fixes #113
Testcases for vue simulator using -
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests
Chores