Skip to content

Disc Storage for full index #6

Answered by KtorZ
catch-21 asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

It's referring to the testnet, and a gross approximation / extrapolation of what the mainnet would be and, it was also before I had to alter the database schema for a feature, causing the whole database to grow about twice as large as initially measured (yet, with the benefits of reducing underlying code complexity; storage is relatively cheap so I believe this is an okay trade-off!).

If you have the exact number, I'd be glad to update the documentation. On the plus side, the memory requirements seem also to be a lot less than 512MB in practice, which is great.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@catch-21
Comment options

Answer selected by catch-21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants