Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Step going up 1 block doesn't generate VL #42

Open
MarkElf opened this issue Apr 16, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Step going up 1 block doesn't generate VL #42

MarkElf opened this issue Apr 16, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@MarkElf
Copy link

MarkElf commented Apr 16, 2019

Full output of /ncp version - pasted from NCP Log.

Server

git-Paper-600 MC: 1.13.2
detected: 1.13.2

NoCheatPlus

Plugin: 1.3-beta.4-CustomFork
MCAccess: 1.4.5-1.12.2|? / CB-Reflect
Hooks: AllViolationsNCP 1.0

Related Plugins

ProtocolLib v4.4.0 | ProtocolSupport v4.29-dev

Describe the issue

Step works going up one block increments in a teleport-like fashion, without generating any VL.

How to reproduce the issue

I've used Wurst (Both legit and simple), and have been told Sigma works as well.

Extra links/Videos (Including debug logs)

https://pastebin.com/Hcy3rkMT - Pretty much just spidering/teleporting up blocks

Any possible config options changed or plugins that may cause interference?

Default configuration.

@CaptainObvious0
Copy link
Owner

I don’t recall changing anything that would effect this, I’ll have to take a second look though.

Thanks for reporting.

@MarkElf
Copy link
Author

MarkElf commented Apr 16, 2019

I have confirmed it to be the same prior to any changes made on your end (b1149 and b1139). Sorry for not mentioning that earlier. It is a general issue with NCP.

@CaptainObvious0
Copy link
Owner

The client is speeding up/sending a very small burst of packets to simulate a player jumping. This would be a bypass of the MorePackets check than SurvivalFly, which was originally thought. I may rework the MorePackets check just because the false positives it produces and the protection is somewhat limited. I just need to take a further look at a good detection method and what exactly the client is doing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants