-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
request for the function of the minimum water level in the mash tun #720
Comments
Sorry for the slow response. |
Hello! Haha, I should have checked my text before translating it! |
Have you looked on the equipment profile? I believe you can use the lauter deadspace parameter (Equipment profile -> first tab). I used a Blichmann boil kettle with a false bottom in the past. I just checked that profile, and it does have that parameter set. Set that and see if it helps. If it doesn't, you could also try manually entering the pre-boil volume parameter. In this case I believe "pre-boil" means the total volume of water including all losses to equipment, boil off ,etc. You will need to do some maths, but you will only need to do it once. If you click on the equipment profile in the tree on the left and edit that, you will need to reassign the equipment to the recipe to see any changes. It is a side effect of how brewtarget works. I would explain, but it is long and not really relevant. If we do add this parameter, I would suggest it be on the equipment profile. |
Hello! It seems yes, that's where it belongs, but I'll try to experiment with the lauter deadspace parameter. Why didn't I do it sooner? Good question! But I believe that dead space is what will be the loss. And in this case, it is the added volume. |
Hello, it's me again, I have a suggestion. which would make life easier for those who use equipment with a false bottom (filter screen). For example, in my 50 L mash tun, the volume under the screen is 13.5 L! Yes, that's a lot.
Of course, this feature is not mandatory. (but maybe in some future version...) The only significant benefit from it is the elimination of errors in the calculations of the erasure scheme. And yet, knowing the minimum amount of water, it will be possible to see honest information about the ratio of water to grain during a mash.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: