Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

calcite dissolution in sediments #3

Open
jornbr opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

calcite dissolution in sediments #3

jornbr opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@jornbr
Copy link
Member

jornbr commented Dec 16, 2021

In sediment.F90 (p4zsed.F90 in PISCES r4.0-HEAD.r13720), calcite dissolution in sediment depends on the calcite saturation state of the overlying water (Eq 91 in paper):

zfactcal = MIN( excess, 0.2 )
zfactcal = MIN( 1., 1.3 * ( 0.2 - zfactcal ) / ( 0.4 - zfactcal ) ) ! Jorn: Eq 91

Does zfactcal represent the preserved fraction, as hinted at by the paper and matching the fact that it increases with increasing saturation [= decreasing zfactcal]? Or does it represent the dissolved fraction, as it is treated in the original PISCES code? In the latter case, however, excess takes negative values when the water is supersaturated. This leads to zfactcal being positive and dissolution occurring. Is that intentional? It leads to further oversaturation and even faster dissolution - a positive feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant