You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would be interested to see django-treenode included in the benchmarks. It is described as "probably the best abstract model/admin for your tree based stuff" and appears to be the most actively developed/maintained package for hierarchical data models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I didn't know this library. If someone wants to do it, happy to have it in our docs 😉
I might do it one day, but… Don't really have a lot of time/resources for open source, nowadays 😕
Apart from that, it's a bit sad to see that it uses the same Python-based approach than django-treebeard & django-mptt. So I guess broken trees every time we use bulk_create, bulk_update, raw SQL + multiprocessing issues. But what's great to see is that it contains a tn_parent foreign key and tn_order integer, meaning that a broken tree can be rebuilt without data loss 🙂 Something that is not always possible with django-treebeard Materialized Path 😬
I would be interested to see django-treenode included in the benchmarks. It is described as "probably the best abstract model/admin for your tree based stuff" and appears to be the most actively developed/maintained package for hierarchical data models.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: