Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UST (Wormhole) Vault implementations and test improvements #25

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sajanrajdev
Copy link
Collaborator

@sajanrajdev sajanrajdev commented Feb 9, 2022

This PR closes issue #24 and 36 from Badger-Strategies

Implementations for the new UST-Wormhole Curve LP vault.

Uses the latest version of the strategy to the cvxCRV handling as well as the bcvxCRV fee event fixes. Fixes introduced on this PR.

Additionally, the PR includes all the improvements made on PR #22:

  • Improvements to the asset generating function that makes it more generalized.
  • The resolver and tests were adapted to to be more resilient to changes on the fees configuration.

All tests are passing for the new vault:
image

Example of harvest:
image

@sajanrajdev sajanrajdev changed the title UST (Wormhole) UST (Wormhole) Vault implementations and test improvements Feb 9, 2022
Copy link

@tabshaikh tabshaikh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM adds ust wormhole convex strat

Copy link
Contributor

@shuklaayush shuklaayush left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addresses check out, tests are passing. LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@GalloDaSballo GalloDaSballo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change LGTM, improved tests and added wormhole, let's go!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants