You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One point that came up in the discussion was to examine the behaviour of the classifier when a patient's similarity rank isn't too different among the classes (rank_A - rank_B --> 0). It's an issue I can put down in the netDx 'to-do' list. I said that while we currently provided a thresholded answer for label assignment, that we were set up for reporting instead a degree of confidence in classification (e.g. one patient may be 0.8 type A while another might by 0.55 type 'A'). We should explore if looking at the distribution of this ranking discrepancy can improve performance by fixing borderline cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One point that came up in the discussion was to examine the behaviour of the classifier when a patient's similarity rank isn't too different among the classes (rank_A - rank_B --> 0). It's an issue I can put down in the netDx 'to-do' list. I said that while we currently provided a thresholded answer for label assignment, that we were set up for reporting instead a degree of confidence in classification (e.g. one patient may be 0.8 type A while another might by 0.55 type 'A'). We should explore if looking at the distribution of this ranking discrepancy can improve performance by fixing borderline cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: