You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The ALA uses the ANSL as the core of its taxonomic backbone (all of these taxa have HTTPS URIs as their ids), but supplements it with CAAB (numeric taxon ids) and NZOR ( taxon ids). These are all treated as . Additionally, there are other taxa that the ALA has included because they appear in other necessary sources (e.g. or ) - these have taxon ids of the form and are marked as at the taxon level. Occurrence records associated with any of these taxa have no taxonomic issue flags. In other words, they are shown as clean and beyond suspicion. I think the only way to find out that some are would be to query the taxon records. this causes issues for users when querying the data where they need to exclude records for these taxa (can't do it it using quality flag).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The ALA uses the ANSL as the core of its taxonomic backbone (all of these taxa have HTTPS URIs as their ids), but supplements it with CAAB (numeric taxon ids) and NZOR ( taxon ids). These are all treated as . Additionally, there are other taxa that the ALA has included because they appear in other necessary sources (e.g. or ) - these have taxon ids of the form and are marked as at the taxon level. Occurrence records associated with any of these taxa have no taxonomic issue flags. In other words, they are shown as clean and beyond suspicion. I think the only way to find out that some are would be to query the taxon records. this causes issues for users when querying the data where they need to exclude records for these taxa (can't do it it using quality flag).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: