Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Display record quality on the interface #260

Open
M-Nicholls opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Display record quality on the interface #260

M-Nicholls opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Data Quality Assertions Anything relating to data quality assertions, including distributions, pipelines and other Enhancement Requests for new feature or improvements to existing features

Comments

@M-Nicholls
Copy link
Contributor

M-Nicholls commented Oct 25, 2021 •
edited
Loading

use colour or icon type to distinguish lower quality records when they are included on the map
colour will be easier to distinguish in a crowded map? - test with users

Add a quality rating to records in the record list and record details page?
set of icons - spatial, taxonomic, temporal, completeness

how to give a rating - whether it fits a profile or not?
@M-Nicholls
Copy link
Contributor Author

M-Nicholls commented Nov 4, 2021 •
edited
Loading

start with two categories: "Authoritative" (meets ALA general) | "Needs assessment" (doesn't meet ALA general)

@acbuyan acbuyan added Data Quality Assertions Anything relating to data quality assertions, including distributions, pipelines and other Enhancement Requests for new feature or improvements to existing features labels Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Data Quality Assertions Anything relating to data quality assertions, including distributions, pipelines and other Enhancement Requests for new feature or improvements to existing features
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@M-Nicholls @acbuyan