-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Detect if a species occurrence record is within its expected spatial distribution #255
Comments
what to do with generalised records use the size of the distribution to determine how much the uncertainty or generalisation matters? indicate the point is in/out but based on the uncertainty the record may be out/in categories - use of categories and distance outside distribution provides a through combination of metrics |
Add to data pre-filters |
what to do if there are multiple overlapping layers - e.g. likely | maybe layers and separate east coast/west coats layers e.g. grey nurse shark |
Single layer / multi layers won't affect the calculation of in/out of layers, but it brings difficulty in calculating distance |
Solution: For every run: If a new expert layer is added or updated, manually deleted exisiting outlier records, then Pipelines will recalculated all index records |
Where should this occur - part of the pipelines or a separate process?
check layers are available outlier detection
run expert distribution outlier detection - is there an expert distribution for the species, if so detect if a species occurrence record point is in/out of the expert distribution
add a distance of the point inside/outside expected distribution field to the record
add expert distribution outlier category
(compare the distance inside/outside the distribution boundary to the uncertainty)
Two scenarios:
Link to pipeline issue: gbif/pipelines#622
Link to Spatial issue: AtlasOfLivingAustralia/spatial-service#186
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: